Evidence mapPaperPMID 10352583Full record

ArticleRadiology1999

Renal volume measurements: accuracy and repeatability of US compared with that of MR imaging.

J Bakker, M Olree, R Kaatee, E E de Lange, K G Moons, J J Beutler, F J Beek

Registry-linked trialAbstract readComparative Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Radiology, 1999. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT02911792 (Effect of Farxiga on Renal Function and Size in Type 2 Diabetic Patients With Hyperfiltration), which is not on this map. Cited by 87 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
87citing papers in PubMed
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 19% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT02911792 phase4completedstarted 2016, after this paper: background citation

Effect of Farxiga on Renal Function and Size in Type 2 Diabetic Patients With Hyperfiltration

Ran2016Enrolled72Registered outcomes1Posted comparisons0ConditionsDiabetes Mellitus, Type 2Armsdapagliflozin, Glipizide 5 MG, Metformin
Open the trial in the graph
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

87 citing papers in PubMed, 249 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. MRI of kidney size matters.Magma (New York, N.Y.) · 2024
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

27 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

J BakkerDepartment of Radiology, University Hospital Utrecht, The Netherlands.
M Olree
R Kaatee
E E de Lange
K G Moons
J J Beutler
F J Beek
Heidelberg University · DELeidsche Rijn Julius Health Centers · NLUniversity Hospital Heidelberg · DEUtrecht University · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTo determine the accuracy and repeatability of ultrasonography (US) with the ellipsoid formula in calculating the renal volume. MATERIALS AND

methodsThe renal volumes in 20 volunteers aged 19-51 years were determined by using US with the ellipsoid formula and magnetic resonance (MR) imaging with the voxel-count method by two independent observers for each modality. The observers performed all measurements twice, with an interval between the first and second examinations. The voxel-count method was the reference standard. Repeatability was evaluated by calculating the SD of the difference (method of Bland and Altman).

resultsRenal volume was underestimated with US by 45 mL (25%) on average. A comparable underestimation was found when the ellipsoid formula was applied to MR images. This indicates that the inaccuracy of US renal volume measurements (a) occurred because the kidney does not resemble an ellipsoid and (b) was not primarily related to the imaging modality. Intra- and interobserver variations in US volume measurements were poor; the SD of the difference was 21-32 mL. For comparison, the SD of the difference in reference-standard measurements was 5-10 mL.

conclusionUse of US with the ellipsoid formula is not appropriate for accurate and reproducible calculation of renal volume.

Indexed as

Magnetic Resonance ImagingAdultAnthropometryFemaleHumansKidneyMaleMiddle AgedObserver VariationReference ValuesReproducibility of ResultsUltrasonography

Identifiers

PMID10352583
OpenAlexW2150877210

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.