Evidence map›Paper›PMID 10987767›Full record

SynthesisBMJ (Clinical research ed.)2000

Systematic review and economic evaluation of Helicobacter pylori eradication treatment for non-ulcer dyspepsia. Dyspepsia Review Group.

P Moayyedi, S Soo, J Deeks, D Forman, J Mason, M Innes, B Delaney

Open access · bronzeAbstract readComparative StudySystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in BMJ (Clinical research ed.), 2000. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 67 papers, 7 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
67citing papers in PubMed, 7 pooled it
53.4field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

67 citing papers in PubMed, 7 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 369 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Guideline
  2. The Association betweenInternational journal of environmental research and public health · 2020
    Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. ACG and CAG Clinical Guideline: Management of Dyspepsia.The American journal of gastroenterology · 2017
    Guideline
  5. Pooled it
  6. Optimum duration of regimens for Helicobacter pylori eradication.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2013
    Pooled it
  7. Pooled it
  8. Trial
  9. Trial
  10. Trial
  11. Trial
  12. Trial
  13. A randomised controlled trial of four management strategies for dyspepsia: relationships between symptom subgroups and strategy outcome.The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2001
    Trial
  14. Trial
  15. Role of Endoscopy in Motility Disorders of Upper Gastrointestinal Tract.Journal of neurogastroenterology and motility · 2023
    Review
  16. Article
  17. Thailand Dyspepsia Guidelines: 2018.Journal of neurogastroenterology and motility · 2019
    Review
  18. Review
  19. Prevalence ofJournal of clinical and diagnostic research : JCDR · 2017
    Article
  20. Population screening and treatment of Helicobacter pylori infection.Nature reviews. Gastroenterology & hepatology · 2017
    Review

7 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

P MoayyediGastroenterology Unit, Centre for Digestive Diseases, General Infirmary at Leeds, Leeds LS1 3EX.
S Soo
J Deeks
D Forman
J Mason
M Innes
B Delaney
Leeds General Infirmary · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesTo evaluate efficacy and cost effectiveness of Helicobacter pylori eradication treatment in patients with non-ulcer dyspepsia infected with H pylori.

designSystematic review of randomised controlled trials comparing H pylori eradication with placebo or another drug treatment. Results were incorporated into a Markov model comparing health service costs and benefits of H pylori eradication with antacid treatment over one year. DATA SOURCES: Six electronic databases were searched for randomised controlled trials from January 1966 to May 2000. Experts in the field, pharmaceutical companies, and journals were contacted for information on any unpublished trials. Trial reports were reviewed according to predefined eligibility and quality criteria.

main outcome measuresRelative risk reduction for remaining dyspeptic symptoms (the same or worse) at 3-12 months. Cost per dyspepsia-free month estimated from Markov model based on estimated relative risk reduction.

resultsTwelve trials were included in the systematic review, nine of which evaluated dyspepsia at 3-12 months in 2541 patients. H pylori eradication treatment was significantly superior to placebo in treating non-ulcer dyspepsia (relative risk reduction 9% (95% confidence interval 4% to 14%)), one case of dyspepsia being cured for every 15 people treated. H pylori eradication cost pound56 per dyspepsia-free month during first year after treatment.

conclusionH pylori eradication may be cost effective treatment for non-ulcer dyspepsia in infected patients but further evidence is needed on decision makers' willingness to pay for relief of dyspepsia.

Indexed as

Helicobacter pyloriAntacidsAnti-Bacterial AgentsCost-Benefit AnalysisDrug CostsDyspepsiaHelicobacter InfectionsHumansInformation Storage and RetrievalMarkov ChainsRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicRiskAntacidsAnti-Bacterial Agents

Identifiers

PMID10987767
PMCPMC27478
OpenAlexW2073208108

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.