Evidence map›Paper›PMID 11062600›Full record

ReviewCurrent hypertension reports2000

Recent advances in the management of hypertension in the elderly.

F J Gennari, A S Gennari

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Current hypertension reports, 2000. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
0.2field-weighted citation impact, top 41% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

F J GennariUniversity of Vermont, College of Medicine, Burgess 315, Fletcher Allen Health Care, Burlington, VT 05401, USA. fgennari@zoo.uvm.edu.
A S Gennari
University of Pittsburgh · USUniversity of Vermont · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Important new advances have occurred in our understanding and approach to management of high blood pressure in the elderly. New clinical trials have re-emphasized the risk of development of cardiovascular and cerebrovascular complications associated with isolated elevations in systolic blood pressure as well as the safety and efficacy of interventions to reduce blood pressure. These trials have shown that systolic blood pressure can be reduced by interventions such as weight loss, restriction of dietary sodium intake, and drugs. In several new trials, the long-acting dihydropyridine calcium channel blockers have been found to be safe and effective in these patients but not superior to other drugs. As in younger individuals with hypertension, drug therapy should be targeted to address comorbidity. Education of primary care physicians concerning these new findings is the next step in reducing the morbidity and mortality of this common problem in the elderly.

Indexed as

AgedAntihypertensive AgentsBlood PressureClinical CompetenceClinical Trials as TopicHumansHypertensionSurvival RateTreatment OutcomeAntihypertensive Agents

Identifiers

PMID11062600
OpenAlexW1977356677

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.