Evidence map›Paper›PMID 11114735›Full record

ReviewOncogene2000

Connecting signaling and cell cycle progression in growth factor-stimulated cells.

S M Jones, A Kazlauskas

Open access · bronzeAbstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Oncogene, 2000. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
2.2field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 75 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Cell Cycle Progression and Synchronization: An Overview.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2022
    Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

S M JonesSchepens Eye Research Institute, 20 Staniford Street, Boston, Massachusetts, MA 02114, USA.
A Kazlauskas
Harvard University · USSmith-Kettlewell Eye Research Institute · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A widely used model system to investigate cell proliferation is stimulation of serum-arrested cells with growth factors. Recent data suggest that there are two waves of growth factor-dependent signaling events required for a proliferative response. One is an acute burst of signaling, which occurs immediately after growth factor stimulation and lasts for 30 - 60 min. The other occurs in a different time frame (8 - 12 h post stimulation), and involves activation of cyclin dependent kinases (Cdks). In addition to a general overview of growth factor-dependent signaling, we present our 'two wave' hypothesis for how signaling and cell cycle progression are linked.

Indexed as

Cell CycleCell DivisionPlatelet-Derived Growth FactorSignal TransductionPlatelet-Derived Growth Factor

Identifiers

PMID11114735
OpenAlexW2330991670

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.