ArticleMedical & biological engineering & computing2001
Systematic methodology for the design of a flexible keel for energy-storing prosthetic feet.
Article in Medical & biological engineering & computing, 2001. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
An effective design method is suggested for a flexible keel design for energy-storing prosthetic feet (ESPF). The basic, two-dimensional shape of the keel is based on anthropometric data and normal gait analysis available in the literature. Cost function is defined for the performance evaluation of the keel. Five factors and five levels of their effect on the performance of the keel are established. By use of an orthogonal array table, 25 trials of dynamic simulations of prosthetic walking are designed, from among 3,125 possible combinations, dramatically reducing the number of total simulations needed to examine sufficiently the contribution of each factor to cost function. A prosthetic walking model is built, and a dynamic simulation of prosthetic walking is performed using the finite element method. The contribution of each factor to cost function is investigated by an analysis of variance (ANOVA), and the average main effects of factors for cost function are calculated. The optimum combination of factor levels is obtained by minimisation of cost function. To examine the structural safety of the keel, the deformation and stress distribution of the keel are investigated by static analysis, and failure indices are calculated by three failure criteria. Finally, the optimum flexible keel is designed with increased energy storage capacity, without failure, and suitable for more active prosthetic walking; the recoverable strain energy stored in the optimum ESPF keel is 25.8J.
Indexed as
Identifiers
11214274What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.