Trial reportBMJ (Clinical research ed.)2001
Randomised controlled trial of structured personal care of type 2 diabetes mellitus.
Trial report in BMJ (Clinical research ed.), 2001. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 2 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 92 papers, 13 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
The Effectiveness of Nurse Practitioner Led Group Visits in Improving Compliance With Diabetic Preventative Services and Modifying Vascular Risk
The Potential of Technology to Improve Chronic Disease Management and Quality of Care
Who cites it
92 citing papers in PubMed, 13 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 301 citations in OpenAlex.
- Quality improvement strategies for diabetes care: Effects on outcomes for adults living with diabetes.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2023Pooled it
- Effectiveness of the chronic care model for adults with type 2 diabetes in primary care: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Systematic reviews · 2022Pooled it
- Manually-generated reminders delivered on paper: effects on professional practice and patient outcomes.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2019Pooled it
- Effect on cardiovascular disease risk factors of interventions to alter consultations between practitioners and patients with type 2 diabetes: A systematic review and meta-analysis of trials in primary care.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2017Pooled it
- Effectiveness of chronic care models for the management of type 2 diabetes mellitus in Europe: a systematic review and meta-analysis.BMJ open · 2017Pooled it
- Effectiveness of chronic care models: opportunities for improving healthcare practice and health outcomes: a systematic review.BMC health services research · 2015Pooled it
- The effectiveness of mobile-health technology-based health behaviour change or disease management interventions for health care consumers: a systematic review.PLoS medicine · 2013Pooled it
- Self-monitoring of blood glucose in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus who are not using insulin.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2012Pooled it
- Intensive glycaemic control for patients with type 2 diabetes: systematic review with meta-analysis and trial sequential analysis of randomised clinical trials.BMJ (Clinical research ed.) · 2011Pooled it
- Multiple risk factor interventions for primary prevention of coronary heart disease.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2011Pooled it
- The effect of feedback to general practitioners on quality of care for people with type 2 diabetes. A systematic review of the literature.BMC family practice · 2009Pooled it
- [Can we improve management and control of chronic diseases?].Atencion primaria · 2006Pooled it
- Interventions in primary care to reduce medication related adverse events and hospital admissions: systematic review and meta-analysis.Quality & safety in health care · 2006Pooled it
- Increased Risk of Tendon Injury Following Structured Care in Patients With Type 2 Diabetes: Post Hoc Analysis of a Large Randomized Controlled Trial With 19 Years of Follow-up.Diabetes care · 2024Trial
- Association Between Primary Care Practitioner Empathy and Risk of Cardiovascular Events and All-Cause Mortality Among Patients With Type 2 Diabetes: A Population-Based Prospective Cohort Study.Annals of family medicine · 2019Trial
- Socio-demographic determinants and effect of structured personal diabetes care: a 19-year follow-up of the randomized controlled study diabetes Care in General Practice (DCGP).BMC endocrine disorders · 2017Trial
- The impact of gender on the long-term morbidity and mortality of patients with type 2 diabetes receiving structured personal care: a 13 year follow-up study.Diabetologia · 2016Trial
- Trial
- Effectiveness of a Peer Support Programme versus Usual Care in Disease Management of Diabetes Mellitus Type 2 regarding Improvement of Metabolic Control: A Cluster-Randomised Controlled Trial.Journal of diabetes research · 2016Trial
- Intentional Weight Loss and Longevity in Overweight Patients with Type 2 Diabetes: A Population-Based Cohort Study.PloS one · 2016Trial
32 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveTo assess the effect of a multifaceted intervention directed at general practitioners on six year mortality, morbidity, and risk factors of patients with newly diagnosed type 2 diabetes.
designPragmatic, open, controlled trial with randomisation of practices to structured personal care or routine care; analysis after 6 years.
setting311 Danish practices with 474 general practitioners (243 in intervention group and 231 in comparison group).
participants874 (90.1%) of 970 patients aged >/=40 years who had diabetes diagnosed in 1989-91 and survived until six year follow up.
interventionRegular follow up and individualised goal setting supported by prompting of doctors, clinical guidelines, feedback, and continuing medical education.
main outcome measuresPredefined clinical non-fatal outcomes, overall mortality, risk factors, and weight.
resultsPredefined non-fatal outcomes and mortality were the same in both groups. The following risk factor levels were lower for intervention patients than for comparison patients (median values): fasting plasma glucose concentration (7.9 v 8.7 mmol/l, P=0.0007), glycated haemoglobin (8.5% v 9.0%, P<0.0001; reference range 5.4-7.4%), systolic blood pressure (145 v 150 mm Hg, P=0.0004), and cholesterol concentration (6.0 v 6.1 mmol/l, P=0.029, adjusted for baseline concentration). Both groups had lost weight since diagnosis (2.6 v 2.0 kg). Metformin was the only drug used more frequently in the intervention group (24% (110/459) v 15% (61/415)). Intervention doctors arranged more follow up consultations, referred fewer patients to diabetes clinics, and set more optimistic goals.
conclusionsIn primary care, individualised goals with educational and surveillance support may for at least six years bring risk factors of patients with type 2 diabetes to a level that has been shown to reduce diabetic complications but without weight gain.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.