Evidence map›Paper›PMID 11914174›Full record

ReviewCurrent psychiatry reports2002

Family, twin, and adoption studies of bipolar disease.

Levi Taylor, Stephen V Faraone, Ming T Tsuang

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Current psychiatry reports, 2002. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 28 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
28citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

28 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Bipolar disorder in children and adolescents.Child and adolescent mental health · 2013
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Fine mapping of candidate regions for bipolar disorder provides strong evidence for susceptibility loci on chromosomes 7q.American journal of medical genetics. Part B, Neuropsychiatric genetics : the official publication of the International Society of Psychiatric Genetics · 2011
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Levi TaylorHarvard Medical School, Department of Psychiatry at the Massachusetts Mental Health Center, 74 Fenwood Road, Boston, MA 02115, USA.
Stephen V Faraone
Ming T Tsuang

Funding

AN EVALUATION OF STEEP: A PROGRAM FOR HIGH RISK MOTHERSR01MH041879 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA TWIN CITIES · PI EGELAND, BYRON R · 1987 to 1991
–
SCHIZOPHRENIA: PSYCHOPATHOLOGY AND HETEROGENEITYR37MH043518 · NIMH · HARVARD UNIVERSITY (MEDICAL SCHOOL) · PI TSUANG, MING T. · 1988 to 1997
–
NIMH NIH HHS 1-R01MH41879-01NIMH NIH HHS 5-OU1MH46318-02NIMH NIH HHS R37MH43518-01
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Bipolar disease features states of severe depression that usually fluctuate with at least one episode of intense elation or mania. It is a disorder that has been thought for some time to have a heritable component. The lifetime prevalence of bipolar disease in the general population is approximately 1%. In contrast, family studies have shown the approximate lifetime risk of a first-degree relative of a bipolar proband to be 5% to 10%. Moreover, studies of monozygotic twins show that their risk of contracting the disease is as much as 75 times greater than that for the general population. In addition, adoption studies have demonstrated that biological relatives of bipolar patients are substantially more likely to have the disorder than are adoptive relatives.

Indexed as

AdoptionBipolar DisorderFamilyHumansPsychotic DisordersTwins

Identifiers

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.