Evidence map›Paper›PMID 12076464›Full record

SynthesisThe Cochrane database of systematic reviews2002

Drug treatments for obstructive sleep apnoea.

I Smith, T Lasserson, J Wright

Abstract readSystematic Review
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Synthesis in The Cochrane database of systematic reviews, 2002. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 29 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Continuous positive airways pressure for obstructive sleep apnoea in adults.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2006
    Pooled it
  2. Oral appliances for obstructive sleep apnoea.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2006
    Pooled it
  3. Obstructive sleep apnea - management update.Neuropsychiatric disease and treatment · 2006
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

I SmithRespiratory Support and Sleep Centre, Papworth Hospital, Papworth Everard, Cambridge, UK, CB3 8RE. ian.smith@papworth-tr.anglox.nhs.uk
T Lasserson
J Wright
Bradford Royal Infirmary · GBPapworth Hospital · GBSt George's, University of London · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe treatment of choice for moderate to severe obstructive sleep apnoea (OSA) is continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) via a mask during sleep. However this is not tolerated by all patients and its role in mild OSA is not proven. Drug therapy has been proposed as an alternative to CPAP in some patients with mild to moderate sleep apnoea. The mechanisms by which drugs might reduce OSA include; a reduction in the proportion of rapid eye movement (REM) sleep (during which apnoeas tend to be more frequent), an increase in ventilatory drive or an increase in upper airway muscle tone during sleep.

objectivesTo determine the efficacy of drug therapies in the treatment of sleep apnoea. SEARCH STRATEGY: Searches were carried out on the Cochrane Airways Group RCT Register. Additional hand searching was performed as relevant. SELECTION CRITERIA: Double blind, randomised placebo controlled trials were included, involving patients with confirmed obstructive sleep apnoea. Trials were excluded if continuous positive airways pressure, mandibular devices or oxygen therapy were used. No restriction was placed upon publication language or trial duration. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: A total of 51 references were identified by electronic searches. 42 studies were retrieved for selection and 9 trials were included in the review. The results for 91 patients were available. No response for further information was forthcoming from the study authors. Results were expressed as (WMD) and 95% Confidence Intervals (95% CI) MAIN

resultsOnly acetazolamide reduced the Hypopnoea Index (1 crossover trial of 9 patients, Weighted Mean Difference -24; 95%Confidence Intervals (95% CI): -4, -44). However there was no symptomatic response and the drug was poorly tolerated. Protriptyline led to a symptomatic improvement (improved vs not improved) in two out of three crossover trials (13 patients, Peto Odds Ratio 29.2; 95%CI 2.8, 301.1) but there was no change in the apnoea frequency. No beneficial effects were found for medroxy progesterone, clonidine, buspirone, aminophylline, theophylline or sabeluzole. REVIEWER'S

conclusionsThe data available do not support the use of drugs as a therapy for OSA. Although the studies examined had limitations there was little to justify further trials of these particular drugs.

Indexed as

HumansRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicSleep Apnea, Obstructive

Identifiers

PMID12076464
OpenAlexW1856747762

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.