Trial reportClinical cardiology2002
Inflammatory predictors of mortality in the Scandinavian Simvastatin Survival Study.
Trial report in Clinical cardiology, 2002. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 33 citations in OpenAlex.
- HMG CoA reductase inhibitors (statins) for people with chronic kidney disease not requiring dialysis.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2023Pooled it
- Trial
- Reduction of Vascular Inflammation, LDL-C, or Both for the Protection from Cardiovascular Events?The open cardiovascular medicine journal · 2018Review
- High-sensitivity C-reactive protein as a risk assessment tool for cardiovascular disease.Clinical cardiology · 2005 · on this mapReview
- Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
background and hypothesisThe predictive value of specific markers of infection and autoimmunity for coronary events, such as the effects of statins on inflammation, is still controversial.
methodsA case-control design was used to compare C-reactive protein (CRP) levels, seropositivity for Chlamydia pneumoniae and Helicobacter pylori, and anti-oxidized low-density lipoprotein (oxLDL) antibody levels in prerandomization blood samples from 129 participants in the Scandinavian Simvastatin Survival Study who died (cases), and from 129 matched participants who were alive during 5-year follow-up (controls).
resultsPatients with CRP levels in the highest quartile had an increased risk of death compared with those in the first through third quartile (odds ratio [OR] = 2.51, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.3-4.8). Seropositivity for Chlamydia pneumoniae or Helicobacter pylori and anti-oxLDL antibody levels were similar in cases and controls (p = NS). At a 4-month control, simvastatin reduced CRP levels (p = 0.009) while placebo did not (p = NS). However, the risk of death associated with high baseline CRP levels was similar in patients randomized to placebo (OR = 2.36, 95% CI 1.06-5.26) or simvastatin (OR = 3.13, 95% CI 1.06-9.21).
conclusionsElevated CRP levels, but not seropositivity for Chlamydia pneumoniae or Helicobacter pylori, nor levels of anti-oxLDL antibodies, predict the risk of death in patients with stable ischemic heart disease. Simvastatin treatment reduces CRP levels, but without affecting the increased risk conferred by higher CRP levels at baseline.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.