Trial reportGut2003
Treatment of Helicobacter pylori in functional dyspepsia resistant to conventional management: a double blind randomised trial with a six month follow up.
Trial report in Gut, 2003. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 57 citations in OpenAlex.
- ACG and CAG Clinical Guideline: Management of Dyspepsia.The American journal of gastroenterology · 2017Guideline
- Helicobacter pylori eradication therapy for functional dyspepsia: Systematic review and meta-analysis.World journal of gastroenterology · 2016Pooled it
- [Clinical practice guideline on the management of patients with dyspepsia. Update 2012].Atencion primaria · 2012Guideline
- Helicobacter pylori and functional dyspepsia: an unsolved issue?World journal of gastroenterology · 2014Review
- Should we still subcategorize helicobacter pylori-associated dyspepsia as functional disease?Journal of neurogastroenterology and motility · 2011Article
- Treatment of functional dyspepsia: where to go and what to do.Journal of gastroenterology · 2006Article
- Drug treatment of functional dyspepsia.World journal of gastroenterology · 2006Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundPrevious studies on the treatment of Helicobacter pylori infection in functional dyspepsia have shown little, if any, effect on dyspeptic symptoms. However, whether such treatment might be of benefit in patients resistant to acid inhibitors has not been formally tested.
aimThe present study investigated the effect of H pylori treatment in patients with functional dyspepsia resistant to conventional treatment. PATIENTS: A total of 181 H pylori positive patients with chronic functional dyspepsia who had not responded to a one week antacid run-in and two week double blind antisecretory or placebo treatment were included.
methodsPatients were randomised to two weeks of treatment with omeprazole 40 mg twice daily combined with amoxicillin 1 g twice daily or omeprazole 20 mg once daily alone. The primary outcome variable ("response") was defined as no need for further therapy or investigations for dyspeptic symptoms 4-6 months after treatment.
resultsH pylori infection was healed in 10% of patients after omeprazole and in 52% after omeprazole plus amoxicillin. The respective "response" rates were 66% and 62% (NS). H pylori treatment and cure of H pylori infection had no effect on complete resolution of all dyspeptic symptoms, individual symptoms, or various aspects of quality of life.
conclusionIn functional dyspepsia, H pylori treatment and cure of H pylori are no more effective for symptoms over six months than short term acid inhibition. These results do not support treatment of H pylori in functional dyspepsia.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.