Evidence map›Paper›PMID 12696990›Full record

ArticlePharmacoEconomics2003

Economic evaluation of orlistat in overweight and obese patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus.

Andreas Maetzel, Jörg Ruof, Melva Covington, Anne Wolf

Abstract readComparative Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in PharmacoEconomics, 2003. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
3.4field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 43 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Evaluation of efficacy and safety of orlistat in obese patients.Indian journal of endocrinology and metabolism · 2011
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Orlistat in the prevention of diabetes in the obese patient.Vascular health and risk management · 2008
    Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 4 institutions in 4 countries.

Andreas MaetzelUniversity Health Network Research Institute, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada. maetzel@uhnres.utoronto.ca
Jörg Ruof
Melva Covington
Anne Wolf
La Roche College · USRoche (Switzerland) · CHUniversity of Toronto · CAUniversity of Virginia · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo estimate the economic value of pharmacological treatment of type 2 diabetes mellitus in overweight and obese patients using orlistat in addition to standard diabetes therapy (i.e., a sulphonlyurea, metformin or insulin) and weight management strategies as compared with standard diabetes therapy and weight management strategies alone in a US-based healthcare setting. The perspective of the study was from the viewpoint of a US healthcare provider. DESIGN AND

settingMarkov state transition model simulating diabetes-related complications and mortality for a period of 11 years. Patients were modelled to continue orlistat therapy for a 52-week period, assuming a 3-year period of weight regain where after 3 years bodyweight would match that of the placebo group. The impact of orlistat on glycosylated haemoglobin (HbA(1c)) values was evaluated directly using data from four randomised, placebo-controlled, 1-year trials of orlistat in overweight or obese adults with type 2 diabetes who also received standard diabetes pharmacotherapy and intensive lifestyle modification. Incidence rates of micro- and macrovascular complications associated with type 2 diabetes and the estimated relative reduction in incidence rates associated with a decrease in mean updated HbA(1C) values were derived from the United Kingdom Prospective Diabetes Study (UKPDS) estimates for a reference population of male patients, 52 years of age. US cost estimates were derived from published sources and presented in 2001 US dollars. Discounting of 3% was applied. Probabilistic sensitivity analysis was applied to evaluate the robustness of the results of the persistence of the effect of orlistat after treatment.

main outcome measuresAverage costs and event-free life-years gained during the 11-year period expressed as the incremental costs divided by the incremental gain in life expectancy.

resultsTreatment with orlistat, 120 mg three times daily, increased event-free life expectancy by 0.13 years over an 11-year period. Average treatment costs were estimated to be 19,987 US dollars in the orlistat group compared with 18,865 US dollars in the group that received diabetes medication and weight management alone. This translated into a cost-effectiveness ratio of 8327 US dollars per event-free life-year gained.

conclusionAdding orlistat as a pharmacological treatment to conventional diabetes and weight management approaches seems to be a cost-effective treatment option for overweight and obese patients with type 2 diabetes.

Indexed as

ObesityAnti-Obesity AgentsBody WeightCost-Benefit AnalysisDiabetes MellitusDiabetes Mellitus, Type 2FemaleHealth Care CostsHumansHypoglycemic AgentsLactonesMaleMarkov ChainsModels, EconomicOrlistatRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicAnti-Obesity AgentsHypoglycemic AgentsLactonesOrlistat

Identifiers

PMID12696990
OpenAlexW2016354863

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.