Evidence mapPaperPMID 12917906Full record

SynthesisThe Cochrane database of systematic reviews2003

Dietary advice given by a dietitian versus other health professional or self-help resources to reduce blood cholesterol.

R L Thompson, C D Summerbell, L Hooper, J P T Higgins, P S Little, D Talbot, S Ebrahim

Abstract readSystematic Review
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Synthesis in The Cochrane database of systematic reviews, 2003. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Dietary advice for reducing cardiovascular risk.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2013
    Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Calorie controlled diet for chronic asthma.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2005
    Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Weight Management in Older Adults.Current obesity reports · 2015
    Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Nutrition in primary care: current practices, attitudes, and barriers.Canadian family physician Medecin de famille canadien · 2010
    Article
  18. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

R L ThompsonInstitute of Human Nutrition, University of Southampton, Level B, South Academic Block, Southampton General Hospital, Southampton, Hampshire, UK, SO16 6YD.
C D Summerbell
L Hooper
J P T Higgins
P S Little
D Talbot
S Ebrahim

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe average level of blood cholesterol is an important determinant of the risk of coronary heart disease. Blood cholesterol can be reduced by dietary means. Although dietitians are trained to provide dietary advice, for practical reasons it is also given by other health professionals and occasionally through the use of self-help resources.

objectivesTo assess the effects of dietary advice given by a dietitian compared with another health professional, or the use of self-help resources, in reducing blood cholesterol in adults. SEARCH STRATEGY: We searched The Cochrane Library (to Issue 3 2002), the EPOC trial register (October 2002), MEDLINE (1966 to September 2002), EMBASE (1980 to September 2002), Cinahl (1982 to August 2002), Human Nutrition (1991 to 1998), Science Citation Index, Social Sciences Citation Index, hand searched conference proceedings on nutrition and heart disease, and contacted experts in the field. SELECTION CRITERIA: Randomised trials of dietary advice given by a dietitian compared with another health professional or self-help resources. The main outcome was difference in blood cholesterol between dietitian groups compared with other intervention groups. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Two reviewers independently extracted data and assessed study quality. MAIN

resultsTwelve studies with 13 comparisons were included, involving 727 people receiving advice from dietitians, 515 from other health professionals and 551 people using self-help resources. Four studies compared dietitian with doctor, seven with self-help resources, and only one study was found for each of the dietitian versus nurse and dietitian versus counsellor comparisons. Participants receiving advice from dietitians experienced a greater reduction in blood cholesterol than those receiving advice only from doctors (-0.25 mmol/L (95% CI -0.37, -0.12 mmol/L)). There was no statistically significant difference in change in blood cholesterol between dietitians and self-help resources (-0.10 mmol/L (95% CI -0.22, 0.03 mmol/L)). No statistically significant differences were detected for secondary outcome measures between any of the comparisons with the exception of dietitian versus nurse for HDLc, where the dietitian group showed a greater reduction (-0.06 mmol/L (95% CI -0.11, -0.01)) and dietitian versus counsellor for body weight, where the dietitian group showed a greater reduction (-5.80 kg (95% CI -8.91, -2.69 kg)). No significant heterogeneity between the studies was detected. REVIEWER'S

conclusionsDietitians were better than doctors at lowering blood cholesterol in the short to medium term, but there was no evidence that they were better than self-help resources. The results should be interpreted with caution as the studies were not of good quality and the analysis was based on a limited number of trials. More evidence is required to assess whether change can be maintained in the longer term. There was no evidence that dietitians provided better outcomes than nurses.

Indexed as

DietDieteticsHealth PersonnelPatient ParticipationCholesterolHumansHypercholesterolemiaNursesPatient Education as TopicPhysiciansRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicCholesterol

Identifiers

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.