Evidence mapPaperPMID 14745499Full record

ReviewCellular and molecular life sciences : CMLS2004

Hopes, disillusions and more hopes from vitamin C.

M C De Tullio, O Arrigoni

Open access · greenAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Cellular and molecular life sciences : CMLS, 2004. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 29 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
29citing papers in PubMed
2.7field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

29 citing papers in PubMed, 84 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Phenotypic characterization ofApplications in plant sciences · 2020
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Characterization of TwoReactive oxygen species (Apex, N.C.) · 2017
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Elevating vitamin C content via overexpression ofIn vitro cellular & developmental biology. Plant : journal of the Tissue Culture Association · 2013
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

M C De TullioDipartimento di Biologia e Patologia Vegetale, Università di Bari, Via E. Orabona 4, 70125 Bari, Italy.
O Arrigoni
University of Bari Aldo Moro · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In the current view of most biochemists and physiologists, the role of L-ascorbic acid (AA) in cell metabolism would be more or less confined to the scavenging of reactive oxygen species. Nevertheless, many data have been collected in our and other laboratories concerning the involvement of AA in many different aspects of cell metabolism. At the present time the molecular sites of action of AA have not been completely elucidated, but recent findings on the specific requirement of AA for the activity of several 2-oxoacid-dependent dioxygenases involved in cell signalling and the activation of transcription factors open new fascinating perspectives for further research.

Indexed as

AnimalsAscorbic AcidDehydroascorbic AcidFree RadicalsHumansOxidation-ReductionPlant Physiological PhenomenaAscorbic AcidDehydroascorbic AcidFree Radicals

Identifiers

PMID14745499
PMCPMC11138719
OpenAlexW2061274653

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.