Evidence mapPaperPMID 14968296Full record

ReviewDiabetologia2004

Incretins, insulin secretion and Type 2 diabetes mellitus.

T Vilsbøll, J J Holst

2 registry-linked trialsOpen access · bronzeAbstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Diabetologia, 2004. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 2 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 105 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
105citing papers in PubMed
15.4field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT01795248 phase4completedstarted 2012, after this paper: background citation

The Impact of Liraglutide on Glucose Tolerance and the Risk of Type 2 Diabetes in Women With Previous Gestational Diabetes Mellitus

Ran2012Enrolled105Registered outcomes18Posted comparisons0ConditionsGestational Diabetes MellitusArmsliraglutide, Placebo
Open the trial in the graph
NCT03199638 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2016, after this paper: background citation

Exercise Snacks and Glutamine to Improve Glucose Control in Adolescents With Type 1 Diabetes

TypeinterventionalSponsorNemours Children's ClinicRan2016 to 2017Enrolled14ConditionsDiabetes Mellitus, Type 1, Autoimmune Diseases, Diabetes Mellitus, Endocrine System DiseasesArmsGlutamine vs. Placebo, Exercise
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

105 citing papers in PubMed, 437 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. An Update on Dipeptidyl Peptidase-IV Inhibiting Peptides.Current protein & peptide science · 2024
    Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Review

45 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

T VilsbøllDepartment of Internal Medicine F, Gentofte University Hospital, Gentofte, Denmark. tivi@gentoftehosp.kbhamt.dk.
J J HolstDepartment of Medical Physiology, The Panum Institute, University of Copenhagen, 2200, Copenhagen N, Denmark.
Gentofte Hospital · DKUniversity of Copenhagen · DK

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

When glucose is taken orally, insulin secretion is stimulated much more than it is when glucose is infused intravenously so as to result in similar glucose concentrations. This effect, which is called the incretin effect and is estimated to be responsible for 50 to 70% of the insulin response to glucose, is caused mainly by the two intestinal insulin-stimulating hormones, glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) and glucose-dependent insulinotropic polypeptide (GIP). Their contributions have been confirmed in mimicry experiments, in experiments with antagonists of their actions, and in experiments where the genes encoding their receptors have been deleted. In patients with Type 2 diabetes, the incretin effect is either greatly impaired or absent, and it is assumed that this could contribute to the inability of these patients to adjust their insulin secretion to their needs. In studies of the mechanism of the impaired incretin effect in Type 2 diabetic patients, it has been found that the secretion of GIP is generally normal, whereas the secretion of GLP-1 is reduced, presumably as a consequence of the diabetic state. It might be of even greater importance that the effect of GLP-1 is preserved whereas the effect of GIP is severely impaired. The impaired GIP effect seems to have a genetic background, but could be aggravated by the diabetic state. The preserved effect of GLP-1 has inspired attempts to treat Type 2 diabetes with GLP-1 or analogues thereof, and intravenous GLP-1 administration has been shown to be able to near-normalize both fasting and postprandial glycaemic concentrations in the patients, perhaps because the treatment compensates for both the impaired secretion of GLP-1 and the impaired action of GIP. Several GLP-1 analogues are currently in clinical development and the reported results are, so far, encouraging.

Indexed as

AnimalsDiabetes Mellitus, Type 2Gastric Inhibitory PolypeptideGlucagonGlucagon-Like Peptide 1HumansInsulinInsulin SecretionPeptide FragmentsProtein PrecursorsGastric Inhibitory PolypeptideGlucagonGlucagon-Like Peptide 1InsulinPeptide FragmentsProtein Precursors

Identifiers

PMID14968296
OpenAlexW1968676703

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.