Evidence map›Paper›PMID 15173894›Full record

ReviewJournal of psychiatry & neuroscience : JPN2004

Gene-environment interaction and the genetics of depression.

Klaus Peter Lesch

Open access · greenAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of psychiatry & neuroscience : JPN, 2004. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 83 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
83citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
10.3field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

83 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 284 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Longitudinal multi-level biomarker analysis of BDNF in major depression and bipolar disorder.European archives of psychiatry and clinical neuroscience · 2020
    Article
  20. Article

23 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.

Klaus Peter LeschMolecular and Clinical Psychobiology, Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, University of Würzburg, Würzburg, Germany. kplesch@mail.uni-wuerzburg.de
University of Würzburg · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Depression is a group of brain disorders with varied origins, complex genetics and obscure neurobiology. Definitions of clinical phenotypes are not rooted in their neurobiology, and animal models of behavioural despair have considerable limitations. Nevertheless, investigation of subtle alterations in gene expression, of correlations between genotype and brain activity, and of environmental variables interacting with genetic variants have advanced research into the genetics of depression. Although the postgenomic era is still in its infancy, several milestones have already been reached: variation in gene expression has been confirmed to play a predominant role in individual differences; gene-environment interactions have been established in humans and in a nonhuman primate model; gene-phenotype correlations have been substantiated by functional neuroimaging; and the notion of gene networks that control brain development is increasingly recognized. Given the etiologic and psychobiologic complexity of mood disorders, it is not surprising that the identification of specific genetic factors is extremely difficult and continues to be among the last frontiers of gene hunting.

Indexed as

EnvironmentGenetic LinkageGenotypeHumansMajor Depressive DisorderPhenotype

Identifiers

PMID15173894
PMCPMC400687
OpenAlexW2171691063

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.