ReviewCirculation2004
Implications of recent clinical trials for the National Cholesterol Education Program Adult Treatment Panel III guidelines.
Review in Circulation, 2004. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. It is linked to 6 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 1,371 papers, 9 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
A Prospective, Double-blinded, Randomised Study to Evaluate the Effects of Different Doses of Statin Treatment on Plaque Volume and Composition in Coronary Disease Determined by Virtual Histology Using Intravascular Ultrasound
Effect of Virgin Coconut Oil (VCO) on Cardiometabolic Parameters in Patients With Dyslipidemia: A Randomized, add-on, Placebo-controlled Clinical Trial
Safety & Efficacy of a Combination Niacin ER/Simvastatin in Patients With Dyslipidemia: A Dose-Ranging Study - SEACOAST
Do Innovative Strategies Complement Medical Management to Reduce Cardiovascular Risk Factors Following Coronary Artery Bypass Graft Surgery?
Muscle Characteristics Associated With Statin Therapy
A Placebo-controlled, Double-blind, Randomized Trial to Compare the Effect of Different Doses of ALN-PCSSC Given as Single or Multiple Subcutaneous Injections in Subjects With High Cardiovascular Risk and Elevated LDL-C
Who cites it
1,371 citing papers in PubMed, 9 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- The Impact of Novel Lipid-Lowering Agents on Cardiovascular Risk Reduction: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Current cardiology reviews · 2025Pooled it
- Time Gained to Cardiovascular Disease by Intensive Lipid-Lowering Therapy: Results of Individual Placebo-Controlled Trials and Pooled Effects.American journal of cardiovascular drugs : drugs, devices, and other interventions · 2024Pooled it
- 2023 Clinical Practice Guidelines for Diabetes Management in Korea: Full Version Recommendation of the Korean Diabetes Association.Diabetes & metabolism journal · 2024Guideline
- Pooled it
- Lipid-Lowering Efficacy of the Capsaicin in Patients With Metabolic Syndrome: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.Frontiers in nutrition · 2022Pooled it
- Association of Preadmission Statin Use and Mortality in Critically Ill Patients: A Meta-Analysis of Cohort Studies.Frontiers in medicine · 2021Pooled it
- Reasons Why Combination Therapy Should Be the New Standard of Care to Achieve the LDL-Cholesterol Targets : Lipid-lowering combination therapy.Current cardiology reports · 2020Pooled it
- Effect of Intensive and Standard Lipid-Lowering Therapy on the Progression of Stroke in Patients With Coronary Artery Syndromes: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.Journal of cardiovascular pharmacology · 2020Pooled it
- Metabolic syndrome and the incidence of knee osteoarthritis: A meta-analysis of prospective cohort studies.PloS one · 2020Pooled it
- The efficacy and safety of berberine in combination with cinnamon supplementation in patients with type 2 diabetes: a randomized clinical trial.European journal of nutrition · 2025Trial
- Efficacy, Safety, and Pharmacokinetics of Inclisiran in Japanese Patients: Results from ORION-15.Journal of atherosclerosis and thrombosis · 2024Trial
- Trial
- Optimal target of LDL cholesterol level for statin treatment: challenges to monotonic relationship with cardiovascular events.BMC medicine · 2022Trial
- Acute and chronic cardiometabolic responses induced by resistance training with blood flow restriction in HIV patients.Scientific reports · 2022Trial
- Combined lipid goal attainment in patients with type 2 diabetes and dyslipidemia: A head-to-head comparative trial of statins.Journal of the Chinese Medical Association : JCMA · 2022Trial
- Artichoke and Bergamot Phytosome Alliance: A Randomized Double Blind Clinical Trial in Mild Hypercholesterolemia.Nutrients · 2021Trial
- Baseline low-density lipoprotein cholesterol predicts the benefit of adding ezetimibe on statin in statin-naïve acute coronary syndrome.Scientific reports · 2021Trial
- Effectiveness of blood pressure-lowering treatment by the levels of baseline Framingham risk score: A post hoc analysis of the Systolic Blood Pressure Intervention Trial (SPRINT).Journal of clinical hypertension (Greenwich, Conn.) · 2019Trial
- Comparison of Two Homogeneous LDL-Cholesterol Assays Using Fresh Hypertriglyceridemic Serum and Quantitative Ultracentrifugation Fractions.Journal of atherosclerosis and thrombosis · 2019Trial
- Trial
1,311 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The Adult Treatment Panel III (ATP III) of the National Cholesterol Education Program issued an evidence-based set of guidelines on cholesterol management in 2001. Since the publication of ATP III, 5 major clinical trials of statin therapy with clinical end points have been published. These trials addressed issues that were not examined in previous clinical trials of cholesterol-lowering therapy. The present document reviews the results of these recent trials and assesses their implications for cholesterol management. Therapeutic lifestyle changes (TLC) remain an essential modality in clinical management. The trials confirm the benefit of cholesterol-lowering therapy in high-risk patients and support the ATP III treatment goal of low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) <100 mg/dL. They support the inclusion of patients with diabetes in the high-risk category and confirm the benefits of LDL-lowering therapy in these patients. They further confirm that older persons benefit from therapeutic lowering of LDL-C. The major recommendations for modifications to footnote the ATP III treatment algorithm are the following. In high-risk persons, the recommended LDL-C goal is <100 mg/dL, but when risk is very high, an LDL-C goal of <70 mg/dL is a therapeutic option, ie, a reasonable clinical strategy, on the basis of available clinical trial evidence. This therapeutic option extends also to patients at very high risk who have a baseline LDL-C <100 mg/dL. Moreover, when a high-risk patient has high triglycerides or low high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C), consideration can be given to combining a fibrate or nicotinic acid with an LDL-lowering drug. For moderately high-risk persons (2+ risk factors and 10-year risk 10% to 20%), the recommended LDL-C goal is <130 mg/dL, but an LDL-C goal <100 mg/dL is a therapeutic option on the basis of recent trial evidence. The latter option extends also to moderately high-risk persons with a baseline LDL-C of 100 to 129 mg/dL. When LDL-lowering drug therapy is employed in high-risk or moderately high-risk persons, it is advised that intensity of therapy be sufficient to achieve at least a 30% to 40% reduction in LDL-C levels. Moreover, any person at high risk or moderately high risk who has lifestyle-related risk factors (eg, obesity, physical inactivity, elevated triglycerides, low HDL-C, or metabolic syndrome) is a candidate for TLC to modify these risk factors regardless of LDL-C level. Finally, for people in lower-risk categories, recent clinical trials do not modify the goals and cutpoints of therapy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
15249516What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.