Evidence map›Paper›PMID 15389231›Full record

Trial reportAmerican heart journal2004

Achieving lipoprotein goals in patients at high risk with severe hypercholesterolemia: efficacy and safety of ezetimibe co-administered with atorvastatin.

Evan Stein, Steen Stender, Pedro Mata, Philip Sager, Damien Ponsonnet, Lorenzo Melani, Leslie Lipka, Ramachandran Suresh, Darbie Maccubbin, Enrico Veltri and 1 more

2 registry-linked trialsAbstract readClinical TrialComparative StudyMulticenter Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Trial report in American heart journal, 2004. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 2 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 37 papers, 5 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
37citing papers in PubMed, 5 pooled it
14.4field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03771053 naunknown statusstarted 2018, after this paper: background citation

Intravascular Ultrasound Evaluation of the Intervention Effect of Simvastatin Combined With Ezetimibe on Coronary Borderline Lesion in Patients With Stable Angina Pectoris and Diabetes Mellitus Compared With Simvastatin Alone

Ran2018Enrolled240Registered outcomes7Posted comparisons0ConditionsCoronary Heart DiseaseArmsEzetimibe with simvastatin, simvastatin
Open the trial in the graph
NCT03867318 phase3completednot on this map

A Phase III Double-Blind Efficacy and Safety of Ezetimibe (SCH 58235) 10 MG in Addition to Atorvastatin in Subjects With Coronary Heart Disease or Multiple Cardiovascular Risk Factors and With Primary Hypercholesterolemia Not Controlled by a Starting Dose (10 mg) of Atorvastatin

TypeinterventionalSponsorOrganon and CoRan2000 to 2001Enrolled621ConditionsHypercholesterolemiaArmsAtorvastatin, Ezetimibe, Placebo for Ezetimibe, Placebo for Atorvastatin
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

37 citing papers in PubMed, 5 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 160 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Guideline
  2. Pooled it
  3. Ezetimibe in high-risk, previously treated statin patients: a systematic review and network meta-analysis of lipid efficacy.Clinical research in cardiology : official journal of the German Cardiac Society · 2019
    Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. The efficacy and safety of intensive statin therapy: a meta-analysis of randomized trials.CMAJ : Canadian Medical Association journal = journal de l'Association medicale canadienne · 2008
    Pooled it
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Trial
  10. Trial
  11. Trial
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.

Evan SteinMetabolic and Atherosclerosis Research Center, Cincinnati, Ohio 45229, USA. ESteinmrl@aol.com
Steen Stender
Pedro Mata
Philip Sager
Damien Ponsonnet
Lorenzo Melani
Leslie Lipka
Ramachandran Suresh
Darbie Maccubbin
Enrico Veltri
Ezetimibe Study Group
Gentofte Hospital · DKHospital Universitario Fundación Jiménez Díaz · ESLouisville Metabolic and Atherosclerosis Research Center · USMerck & Co., Inc., Rahway, NJ, USA (United States) · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundDespite the efficacy of statins in lowering low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) levels, many patients who are at high risk for heart disease with hypercholesterolemia require additional LDL-C level reduction. The cholesterol absorption inhibitor, ezetimibe, has been shown to provide significant incremental reductions in LDL-C levels when co-administered with statins. This study was performed to compare the efficacy and safety of ezetimibe (10 mg) plus response-based atorvastatin titration versus response-based atorvastatin titration alone in the attainment of LDL-C goals in subjects who are at high risk for coronary heart disease (CHD) and are not at their LDL-C goal on the starting dose of atorvastatin.

methodsThis was a 14-week, multicenter, randomized, double-blind, active-controlled study conducted in 113 clinical research centers in 21 countries. Participants were adults with heterozygous familial hypercholesterolemia (HeFH), CHD, or multiple (> or =2) cardiovascular risk factors, and a LDL-C level > or =130 mg/dL after a 6- to 10-week dietary stabilization and atorvastatin (10 mg/day) open-label run-in period. Eligible subjects continued to receive atorvastatin (10 mg) and were randomized to receive blinded treatment with ezetimibe (10 mg/day; n = 305) or an additional 10 mg/day of atorvastatin (n = 316). The atorvastatin dose in both groups was doubled after 4 weeks, 9 weeks, or both when the LDL-C level was not at its goal (< or =100 mg/dL), so that patients receiving combined therapy could reach 40 mg/day and patients receiving atorvastatin alone could reach 80 mg/day. The primary end point was the proportion of subjects achieving their LDL-C level goal at week 14. A secondary end point was the change in LDL-C level and other lipid parameters at 4 weeks after ezetimibe co-administration with 10 mg/day of atorvastatin versus 20 mg/day of atorvastatin monotherapy.

resultsThe proportion of subjects reaching their target LDL-C level goal of < or =100 mg/dL was significantly higher in the co-administration group than in the atorvastatin monotherapy group (22% vs 7%; P <.01). At 4 weeks, levels of LDL-C, triglycerides, and non-high-density lipoprotein cholesterol were reduced significantly more by combination therapy than by doubling the dose of atorvastatin (LDL-C -22.8% versus -8.6%; P <.01). The combination regimen had a safety and tolerability profile similar to that of atorvastatin alone.

conclusionsThe addition of ezetimibe to the starting dose of 10 mg/day of atorvastatin followed by response-based atorvastatin dose titration to a maximum of 40 mg/day provides a more effective means for reducing LDL-C levels in patients at high risk for CHD than continued doubling of atorvastatin as high as 80 mg/day alone.

Indexed as

AdolescentAdultAgedAged, 80 and overAnticholesteremic AgentsAtorvastatinAzetidinesCholesterolCholesterol, LDLDouble-Blind MethodDrug Therapy, CombinationEzetimibeFemaleHeptanoic AcidsHumansHypercholesterolemiaAnticholesteremic AgentsAtorvastatinAzetidinesCholesterolCholesterol, LDLEzetimibeHeptanoic AcidsPyrrolesTriglycerides

Identifiers

PMID15389231
OpenAlexW2136295087

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.