Evidence map›Paper›PMID 15531000›Full record

ReviewClinical therapeutics2004

Rosuvastatin in the management of hyperlipidemia.

Judy W M Cheng

Registry-linked trialAbstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Clinical therapeutics, 2004. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04862962 (Retrospective Study to Evaluate the Safety of the Fixed-dose Combination Rosuvastatin / Ezetimibe as a Treatment for Patients With Dyslipidaemia in Usual Medical Practice.), which is not on this map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
5.1field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04862962 completedstarted 2021, after this paper: background citation

Retrospective Study to Evaluate the Safety of the Fixed-dose Combination Rosuvastatin / Ezetimibe as a Treatment for Patients With Dyslipidaemia in Usual Medical Practice.

Ran2021Enrolled120Registered outcomes5Posted comparisons0ConditionsDyslipidemiasArmsRosuvastatin 10 or 20mg /Ezetimibe 10 mg Fixed Dose
Open the trial in the graph
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 69 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Effect of polycan, a β-glucan originating fromExperimental and therapeutic medicine · 2015
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Are HIV positive patients resistant to statin therapy?Lipids in health and disease · 2007
    Article
  12. Review
  13. Rosuvastatin: an independent analysis of risks and benefits.MedGenMed : Medscape general medicine · 2006
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.

Judy W M ChengArnold and Marie Schwartz College of Pharmacy and Health Sciences, Long Island University, New York, USA. judy.cheng@liu.edu
Mount Sinai Hospital · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundRosuvastatin is a new statin indicated to reduce elevated levels of total cholesterol, low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C), and triglycerides and to increase levels of high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C) in patients with primary hypercholesterolemia, mixed dyslipidemia, and homozygous familial hypercholesterolemia.

objectiveThe purpose of this article was to review the pharmacology, clinical efficacy, and tolerability of rosuvastatin as monotherapy and combination therapy for patients with hyperlipidemia.

methodsA literature review was conducted using the search term rosuvastatin to identify English-language peer-reviewed articles and abstracts in the MEDLINE and Current Contents databases (both 1966 to March 2004). Citations from available articles were reviewed for additional references, and selected information from the manufacturer was discussed.

resultsRosuvastatin 10 to 40 mg/d reduced LDL-C by 43% to 63% (P < 0.05). Compared with other statins, rosuvastatin had the highest dose-to-dose potency in lowering LDL-C (reduction of 60% vs 50% with atorvastatin, 40% with simvastatin, 30% with pravastatin or lovastatin, and 20% with fluvastatin) and better efficacy in raising HDL-C (increase of approximately 10% vs approximately 5% with other statins; P < 0.05). Rosuvastatin enabled significantly more patients to achieve the National Cholesterol Education Program (NCEP) goals for LDL-C with lower doses (P < 0.05). Rosuvastatin was well tolerated. Incidences of myopathy and liver function test abnormalities were rare and comparable to those of other statins. Because it is not metabolized by the cytochrome P-450 enzymes, rosuvastatin had fewer clinically significant drug interactions compared with other statins. Studies to assess the effect of rosuvastatin on cardiovascular outcomes are ongoing.

conclusionsClinical studies continue to demonstrate that achieving optimal levels of LDL-C is an important goal in reducing cardiovascular events. Recent evidence suggests the need for an even lower LDL-C goal than that being recommended by the NCEP Based on the studies included in this review, rosuvastatin may help patients achieve optimal goals early with lower dosages, thus reducing the need for dose titration or combination therapy.

Indexed as

Dose-Response Relationship, DrugDrug InteractionsDrug Therapy, CombinationFluorobenzenesHumansHydroxymethylglutaryl-CoA Reductase InhibitorsHyperlipidemiasHyperlipoproteinemia Type IIPyrimidinesRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicRosuvastatin CalciumSulfonamidesFluorobenzenesHydroxymethylglutaryl-CoA Reductase InhibitorsPyrimidinesRosuvastatin CalciumSulfonamides

Identifiers

PMID15531000
OpenAlexW2026338569

What Socratic holds

Texttitle and abstract
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.