Evidence map›Paper›PMID 15610326›Full record

Trial reportJournal of general internal medicine2004

A practical randomized trial to improve diabetes care.

Russell E Glasgow, Paul A Nutting, Diane K King, Candace C Nelson, Gary Cutter, Bridget Gaglio, Alanna Kulchak Rahm, Holly Whitesides, Hilarea Amthauer

Registry-linked trialOpen access · bronzeAbstract readClinical TrialRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Journal of general internal medicine, 2004. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03066596 (Promoting Asthma Guidelines and Management Through Technology-Based Intervention and Care Coordination), which is not on this map. Cited by 36 papers, 9 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
36citing papers in PubMed, 9 pooled it
4.2field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03066596 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2017, after this paper: background citation

Promoting Asthma Guidelines and Management Through Technology-Based Intervention and Care Coordination

TypeinterventionalSponsorMontefiore Medical CenterRan2017 to 2024Enrolled530ConditionsAsthma ChildhoodArmseMPI
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

36 citing papers in PubMed, 9 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 94 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Interventions to increase attendance for diabetic retinopathy screening.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2018
    Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Pooled it
  8. Pooled it
  9. Pooled it
  10. Trial
  11. Trial
  12. Trial
  13. Trial
  14. Trial
  15. Trial
  16. Trial
  17. Review
  18. Observational
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Russell E GlasgowKaiser Permanente Colorado, Denver, 81240, USA. russg@ris.net
Paul A Nutting
Diane K King
Candace C Nelson
Gary Cutter
Bridget Gaglio
Alanna Kulchak Rahm
Holly Whitesides
Hilarea Amthauer
Kaiser Permanente · USCenter for Research Strategies · USCooper Institute · US

Funding

A PATIENT ACTIVATION APPROACH TO IMPROVING DIABETES CARER18HS010123 · AHRQ · KAISER FOUNDATION RESEARCH INSTITUTE · PI GLASGOW, RUSSELL E · 2000 to 2003
–
AHRQ HHS HS10123AHRQ HHS R18 HS010123
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveThere is a well-documented gap between diabetes care guidelines and the services received by patients in almost all health care settings. This project reports initial results from a computer-assisted, patient-centered intervention to improve the level of recommended services received by patients from a wide variety of primary care providers. DESIGN AND SETTINGS: Eight hundred eighty-six patients with type 2 diabetes under the care of 52 primary care physicians participated in the Diabetes Priority Program. Physicians were stratified and randomized to intervention or control conditions and evaluated on 2 primary outcomes: number of recommended laboratory screenings and recommended patient-centered care activities completed. Secondary outcomes were evaluated using the Problem Areas in Diabetes scale and the Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ)-9 depression scale, and the RE-AIM framework was used to evaluate potential for dissemination.

resultsThe program was well-implemented and significantly improved both number of recommended laboratory assays (3.4 vs 3.1; P <.001) and patient-centered aspects of diabetes care patients received (3.6 vs 3.2; P <.001) compared to those in randomized control practices. Activities that were increased most were foot exams (follow-up rates of 80% vs 52%; P <.003) and nutrition counseling (76% vs 52%; P <.001).

conclusionsPatients are very willing to participate in a brief computer-assisted intervention that is effective in enhancing quality of diabetes care. Staff in primary care offices can consistently deliver an intervention of this nature, but most physicians were unwilling to participate in this translation research study.

Indexed as

Attitude of Health PersonnelCounselingDiabetes Mellitus, Type 2FemaleFollow-Up StudiesFootHumansMaleMiddle AgedOutcome Assessment, Health CarePatient-Centered CarePhysiciansQuality of Health Care

Identifiers

PMID15610326
PMCPMC1492587
OpenAlexW2045207173

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.