Strategies to curb the epidemic of diabetes and obesity in primary care settings.

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

1. Risk factors for type 2 diabetes among women with gestational diabetes: a systematic review.The American journal of medicine · 2009
   Pooled it
2. The Negligible Influence of Chronic Obesity on Hospitalization, Clinical Status, and Complications in Elective Posterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion.International journal of chronic diseases · 2016
   Article
3. Impact of population aging on trends in diabetes prevalence: A meta-regression analysis of 160,000 Japanese adults.Journal of diabetes investigation · 2015
   Article

Corrections and comments

• Comment on
  A practical randomized trial to improve diabetes care.2004

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

Abstract

PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.

Indexed as