ReviewDrugs2005
Pharmacological strategies to reduce cardiovascular risk in type 2 diabetes mellitus: an update.
Review in Drugs, 2005. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Morbidity and mortality in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus is largely dominated by the occurrence of cardiovascular disease (CVD). Treatment of known risk factors of CVD has proven to be beneficial in terms of reduction in risk of major CVD events in the general population. Recent trials have provided information on the treatment of hyperglycaemia, hypertension, dyslipidaemia and platelet aggregation in the patient with type 2 diabetes. Strict glycaemic control is not associated with a significant reduction in CVD risk, although new hypoglycaemic agents may offer additional benefits. In contrast, it has been demonstrated that treatment of hypertension and dyslipidaemia significantly reduce cardiovascular risk. Meticulous control of blood pressure to a level < or =130/80 mm Hg, preferably using renin-angiotensin system-modulating agents, is of proven value. Use of HMG-CoA reductase inhibitors (statins) as low-density lipoprotein (LDL)-cholesterol-lowering therapy, initiated at a level of > or =2.60 mmol/L is firmly established. Recent trials lend support to lowering the target level for LDL-cholesterol-lowering therapy to < or =1.81 mmol/L. Mainly based on risk analogy, international guidelines advocate the use of aspirin (acetylsalicylic acid) in the primary prevention of CVD in patients with type 2 diabetes. However, there is no support from large trials that the estimated 25% risk reduction in primary prevention in a high-risk population is the same in the subgroup with diabetes. An intensified approach in order to identify and treat cardiovascular risk factors in patients with type 2 diabetes, stratified to individual patients, is necessary to reduce the excess cardiovascular burden of these patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.