Trial reportThe New England journal of medicine2005
Intensive lipid lowering with atorvastatin in patients with stable coronary disease.
Trial report in The New England journal of medicine, 2005. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It reports registered trial NCT01200056. Cited by 895 papers, 20 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
A Prospective, Double-blinded, Randomised Study to Evaluate the Effects of Different Doses of Statin Treatment on Plaque Volume and Composition in Coronary Disease Determined by Virtual Histology Using Intravascular Ultrasound
Statin Intensity, Achieved LDL Cholesterol, and Cardiovascular Outcome in Statin Therapy in Patients With Coronary Artery Disease (Post-hoc Study of TNT Trial)
Open the trial in the graphEstudio clínico Fase III Para Evaluar la Eficacia terapéutica en Pacientes Mexicanos Con Dislipidemia Mediante el Uso vía Oral de L-Carnitina + Atorvastatina Comparado Con Atorvastatina
Comparison of High and Moderate Intensity Statins in Achieving the Target LDL-C Level After Acute Coronary Syndrome: Randomized Controlled Trial
Open the trial in the graphThe Effect of Fenofibrate on Endothelial Function and HDL in Patients With Coronary Heart Disease and LDL-C at Goal
Statin Therapy To Limit Cognitive Dysfunction After Cardiac Surgery
Who cites it
895 citing papers in PubMed, 20 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 3,486 citations in OpenAlex.
- Assessment of adverse effects attributed to statin therapy in product labels: a meta-analysis of double-blind randomised controlled trials.Lancet (London, England) · 2026Pooled it
- Agreement Between Mega-Trials and Smaller Trials: A Systematic Review and Meta-Research Analysis.JAMA network open · 2024Pooled it
- Comparative Muscle Tolerability of Different Types and Intensities of Statins: A Network Meta-Analysis of Double-Blind Randomized Controlled Trials.Cardiovascular drugs and therapy · 2024Pooled it
- Effects of statin therapy on diagnoses of new-onset diabetes and worsening glycaemia in large-scale randomised blinded statin trials: an individual participant data meta-analysis.The lancet. Diabetes & endocrinology · 2024 · on this mapPooled it
- Lipid-Lowering Therapy and Risk of Hemorrhagic Stroke: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.Journal of the American Heart Association · 2024 · on this mapPooled it
- Moderate-Intensity Rosuvastatin/Ezetimibe Combination versus Quadruple-Dose Rosuvastatin Monotherapy: A Meta-Analysis and Systemic Review.Yonsei medical journal · 2024Pooled it
- HMG CoA reductase inhibitors (statins) for people with chronic kidney disease not requiring dialysis.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2023Pooled it
- Impact of vascular screening interventions on perceived threat, efficacy beliefs and behavioural intentions: a systematic narrative review.Health promotion international · 2023Pooled it
- Comparative efficacy and safety among high-intensity statins. Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Journal of comparative effectiveness research · 2023Pooled it
- Lipid-Lowering Trials Are Not Representative of Patients Managed in Clinical Practice: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Exclusion Criteria.Journal of the American Heart Association · 2023Pooled it
- Harmonisation of large-scale, heterogeneous individual participant adverse event data from randomised trials of statin therapy.Clinical trials (London, England) · 2022Pooled it
- Atherogenic Lipoproteins for the Statin Residual Cardiovascular Disease Risk.International journal of molecular sciences · 2022Pooled it
- Effect of statin therapy on muscle symptoms: an individual participant data meta-analysis of large-scale, randomised, double-blind trials.Lancet (London, England) · 2022 · on this mapPooled it
- Prevalence of statin intolerance: a meta-analysis.European heart journal · 2022 · on this mapPooled it
- The promising novel therapies for familial hypercholesterolemia.Journal of clinical laboratory analysis · 2022Pooled it
- Pooled it
- Is non-high-density lipoprotein associated with metabolic syndrome? A systematic review and meta-analysis.Frontiers in endocrinology · 2022Pooled it
- Associations between statins and adverse events in secondary prevention of cardiovascular disease: Pairwise, network, and dose-response meta-analyses of 47 randomized controlled trials.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2022Pooled it
- Genetic meta-analysis of cancer diagnosis following statin use identifies new associations and implicates human leukocyte antigen (HLA) in women.The pharmacogenomics journal · 2021Pooled it
- A systematic review on pharmacokinetics, cardiovascular outcomes and safety profiles of statins in cirrhosis.BMC gastroenterology · 2021Pooled it
835 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
- Commented on by
- Commented on by
- Commented on by
- Commented on by
- Commented on by
- Commented on by
- Commented on by
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
12 authors at 11 institutions in 6 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundPrevious trials have demonstrated that lowering low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol levels below currently recommended levels is beneficial in patients with acute coronary syndromes. We prospectively assessed the efficacy and safety of lowering LDL cholesterol levels below 100 mg per deciliter (2.6 mmol per liter) in patients with stable coronary heart disease (CHD).
methodsA total of 10,001 patients with clinically evident CHD and LDL cholesterol levels of less than 130 mg per deciliter (3.4 mmol per liter) were randomly assigned to double-blind therapy and received either 10 mg or 80 mg of atorvastatin per day. Patients were followed for a median of 4.9 years. The primary end point was the occurrence of a first major cardiovascular event, defined as death from CHD, nonfatal non-procedure-related myocardial infarction, resuscitation after cardiac arrest, or fatal or nonfatal stroke.
resultsThe mean LDL cholesterol levels were 77 mg per deciliter (2.0 mmol per liter) during treatment with 80 mg of atorvastatin and 101 mg per deciliter (2.6 mmol per liter) during treatment with 10 mg of atorvastatin. The incidence of persistent elevations in liver aminotransferase levels was 0.2 percent in the group given 10 mg of atorvastatin and 1.2 percent in the group given 80 mg of atorvastatin (P<0.001). A primary event occurred in 434 patients (8.7 percent) receiving 80 mg of atorvastatin, as compared with 548 patients (10.9 percent) receiving 10 mg of atorvastatin, representing an absolute reduction in the rate of major cardiovascular events of 2.2 percent and a 22 percent relative reduction in risk (hazard ratio, 0.78; 95 percent confidence interval, 0.69 to 0.89; P<0.001). There was no difference between the two treatment groups in overall mortality.
conclusionsIntensive lipid-lowering therapy with 80 mg of atorvastatin per day in patients with stable CHD provides significant clinical benefit beyond that afforded by treatment with 10 mg of atorvastatin per day. This occurred with a greater incidence of elevated aminotransferase levels.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.