Evidence mapPaperPMID 15911705Full record

ArticleCirculation2005

The issue of statin safety: where do we stand?

Scott M Grundy

Abstract readEditorialComment
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Circulation, 2005. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. The efficacy and safety of intensive statin therapy: a meta-analysis of randomized trials.CMAJ : Canadian Medical Association journal = journal de l'Association medicale canadienne · 2008
    Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Observational
  5. A novel therapeutic effect of statins on nephrogenic diabetes insipidus.Journal of cellular and molecular medicine · 2015
    Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Rosuvastatin: an independent analysis of risks and benefits.MedGenMed : Medscape general medicine · 2006
    Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Scott M Grundy

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.

Indexed as

Drug ApprovalChemical and Drug Induced Liver InjuryFluorobenzenesHumansHydroxymethylglutaryl-CoA Reductase InhibitorsKidney DiseasesLipoproteins, LDLPyridinesPyrimidinesRisk AssessmentRosuvastatin CalciumSulfonamidesTreatment OutcomecerivastatinFluorobenzenesHydroxymethylglutaryl-CoA Reductase InhibitorsLipoproteins, LDLPyridinesPyrimidinesRosuvastatin CalciumSulfonamides

Identifiers

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.