ArticleAmerican journal of human genetics2005
A powerful and robust method for mapping quantitative trait loci in general pedigrees.
Article in American journal of human genetics, 2005. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
14 citing papers in PubMed.
- Group Sequential Design and Monitoring of Clustered Data in Randomized Eye Trials.Statistics in biopharmaceutical research · 2025Article
- Statistically efficient association analysis of quantitative traits with haplotypes and untyped SNPs in family studies.BMC genetics · 2020Article
- A UNIFIED FRAMEWORK FOR VARIANCE COMPONENT ESTIMATION WITH SUMMARY STATISTICS IN GENOME-WIDE ASSOCIATION STUDIES.The annals of applied statistics · 2017Article
- A semiparametric method for comparing the discriminatory ability of biomarkers subject to limit of detection.Statistics in medicine · 2017Article
- Epistatic association mapping in homozygous crop cultivars.PloS one · 2011Article
- Variance-components methods for linkage and association analysis of ordinal traits in general pedigrees.Genetic epidemiology · 2010Article
- Effects of normalization on quantitative traits in association test.BMC bioinformatics · 2009Article
- A Variance-Component Framework for Pedigree Analysis of Continuous and Categorical Outcomes.Statistics in biosciences · 2009Article
- Rank-based inverse normal transformations are increasingly used, but are they merited?Behavior genetics · 2009Article
- Robust Bayesian mapping of quantitative trait loci using Student-t distribution for residual.TAG. Theoretical and applied genetics. Theoretische und angewandte Genetik · 2009Article
- Robust score statistics for QTL linkage analysis.American journal of human genetics · 2008Article
- Semiparametric methods for genome-wide linkage analysis of human gene expression data.BMC proceedings · 2007Article
- Normalizing a large number of quantitative traits using empirical normal quantile transformation.BMC proceedings · 2007Article
- Quantitative trait linkage analysis using Gaussian copulas.Genetics · 2006Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The variance-components model is the method of choice for mapping quantitative trait loci in general human pedigrees. This model assumes normally distributed trait values and includes a major gene effect, random polygenic and environmental effects, and covariate effects. Violation of the normality assumption has detrimental effects on the type I error and power. One possible way of achieving normality is to transform trait values. The true transformation is unknown in practice, and different transformations may yield conflicting results. In addition, the commonly used transformations are ineffective in dealing with outlying trait values. We propose a novel extension of the variance-components model that allows the true transformation function to be completely unspecified. We present efficient likelihood-based procedures to estimate variance components and to test for genetic linkage. Simulation studies demonstrated that the new method is as powerful as the existing variance-components methods when the normality assumption holds; when the normality assumption fails, the new method still provides accurate control of type I error and is substantially more powerful than the existing methods. We performed a genomewide scan of monoamine oxidase B for the Collaborative Study on the Genetics of Alcoholism. In that study, the results that are based on the existing variance-components method changed dramatically when three outlying trait values were excluded from the analysis, whereas our method yielded essentially the same answers with or without those three outliers. The computer program that implements the new method is freely available.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.