Evidence map›Paper›PMID 16044339›Full record

ArticleEuropean journal of clinical pharmacology2005

Statin-macrolide interaction risk: a population-based study throughout a general practice database.

Nadia Piacentini, Gianluca Trifiró, Michele Tari, Salvatore Moretti, Vincenzo Arcoraci, UVEC group

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in European journal of clinical pharmacology, 2005. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Lycopene andPharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Observational
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Observational
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Don't blame the bones!European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging · 2011
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Nadia PiacentiniDepartment of Clinical and Experimental Medicine and Pharmacology, Pharmacology Unit, University of Messina, Via Consolare Valeria-Gazzi, 98125 Messina, Italy.
Gianluca Trifiró
Michele Tari
Salvatore Moretti
Vincenzo Arcoraci
UVEC group

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionThe myopathy risk associated with statin use increases in case of concomitant prescription of certain drugs, such as cytochrome P(450) (CYP) system inhibitors (i.e., macrolides). The aim of this study was to assess whether concurrent statin/macrolide prescriptions at high interaction risk are commonly written in a general practice setting.

methodsFor this study, 156 general practitioners (GPs) with a patient population of almost 200,000 individuals, and participating in the Arianna database set up by "Caserta-1" Local health-Service Agency (ASL), were recruited. Within such a study sample, subjects receiving at least one statin/macrolide concomitant prescription during the year 2003 were identified. Sensitivity analysis was performed to assess the time distribution of high-risk macrolide prescriptions written within +/-10 days from the statin prescription date.

resultsAmong 190,124 patients included in the study, 7,176 (3.8%) received at least one statin prescription during the observation period. Of these, 228 (3.2%) were occasionally co-prescribed with any macrolide on the same date, in 153 cases (2.1% of statin users) the macrolide being of high interaction risk. In particular, 2.1% (55) of simvastatin users and 2.2% (64) of patients on atorvastatin were prescribed with high-risk macrolide on the same date versus 0.6% and 1.8% of patients prescribed with fluvastatin and pravastatin, respectively. Concerning GPs, 99 (63.5%) co-administered statin and macrolide at high interaction risk at least once.

conclusionsMost GPs occasionally prescribed statin/macrolide at high interaction risk on the same date, despite the availability of therapeutic alternatives. Prevention strategies targeted to increase awareness of health professionals about the interaction risks of widely prescribed drugs are needed.

Indexed as

Practice Patterns, Physicians'AdolescentAdultAgedAged, 80 and overAnti-Bacterial AgentsDatabases, FactualDrug InteractionsDrug PrescriptionsFamily PracticeFemaleHumansHydroxymethylglutaryl-CoA Reductase InhibitorsItalyMacrolidesMaleAnti-Bacterial AgentsHydroxymethylglutaryl-CoA Reductase InhibitorsMacrolides

Identifiers

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.