ArticleCNS drugs2005
Evaluation of HMG-CoA reductase inhibitors for multiple sclerosis: opportunities and obstacles.
Article in CNS drugs, 2005. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 17 citations in OpenAlex.
- Iron behaving badly: inappropriate iron chelation as a major contributor to the aetiology of vascular and other progressive inflammatory and degenerative diseases.BMC medical genomics · 2009Article
- Sequestration of free cholesterol in cell membranes by prions correlates with cytoplasmic phospholipase A2 activation.BMC biology · 2008Article
- Statin adverse effects : a review of the literature and evidence for a mitochondrial mechanism.American journal of cardiovascular drugs : drugs, devices, and other interventions · 2008Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
Abstract
The disease-modifying agents currently used in the treatment of multiple sclerosis (MS) are not completely effective and are associated with adverse effects and high costs. Thus, alternative treatment options are highly desirable. HMG-CoA reductase inhibitors (statins), widely prescribed as cholesterol-lowering agents, may be a future treatment option for MS--either in an add-on therapy regimen or alone--as they have been shown to exhibit potent immunomodulatory effects. Several recent reports have demonstrated that HMG-CoA reductase inhibitors prevent and reverse chronic and relapsing experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis, an animal model of MS. Furthermore, in vitro experiments with human immune cells have shown an immunomodulatory mode of action of HMG-CoA reductase inhibitors that is comparable to that of interferon-beta, an established treatment for MS. An open-label clinical trial assessing simvastatin treatment in patients with MS revealed a significant decrease in the number and volume of new lesions, as assessed using magnetic resonance imaging, and a favourable safety profile. A large multicentre, placebo-controlled phase II clinical trial assessing atorvastatin in patients with a clinically isolated syndrome (i.e. a single clinical event that is indicative of demyelination, and that predisposes to the development MS) has recently been initiated. However, prospective placebo-controlled trials of HMG-CoA reductase inhibitors in definite MS are difficult to perform because of ethical and financial issues. Furthermore, overly optimistic reports in the popular media, as well as the often uncontrolled access to HMG-CoA reductase inhibitors by patients with MS, complicate the evaluation of HMG-CoA reductase inhibitors as a realistic future treatment option for MS.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.