Evidence mapPaperPMID 16458167Full record

ReviewJournal of the American College of Cardiology2006

Insights from the NHLBI-Sponsored Women's Ischemia Syndrome Evaluation (WISE) Study: Part II: gender differences in presentation, diagnosis, and outcome with regard to gender-based pathophysiology of atherosclerosis and macrovascular and microvascular coronary disease.

C Noel Bairey Merz, Leslee J Shaw, Steven E Reis, Vera Bittner, Sheryl F Kelsey, Marian Olson, B Delia Johnson, Carl J Pepine, Sunil Mankad, Barry L Sharaf and 6 more

2 registry-linked trialsAbstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of the American College of Cardiology, 2006. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 2 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 319 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
319citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT02910154 nacompletedstarted 2016, after this paper: background citation

Comprehensive Treatment of Angina in Women With Microvascular Dysfunction - a Proof of Concept Study of the iPower Cohort

Ran2016Enrolled62Registered outcomes9Posted comparisons0ConditionsAngina Pectoris, Coronary Microvascular DiseaseArmsdiet, Medication (with statin and ACE-inhibition), training
Open the trial in the graph
NCT01394549 completednot on this mapstarted 2011, after this paper: background citation

Causes, Analysis of the Sub-evaluating Coronary Syndromes Acute and Disparities in France in Women

TypeobservationalSponsorFrench Cardiology SocietyRan2011 to 2012Enrolled319ConditionsCoronary Acute Syndrome
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

319 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. A single dose of dietary nitrate supplementation protects against endothelial ischemia-reperfusion injury in early postmenopausal women.Applied physiology, nutrition, and metabolism = Physiologie appliquee, nutrition et metabolisme · 2022
    Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Trial
  10. Trial
  11. Trial
  12. Trial
  13. Trial
  14. Trial
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Guideline for Chronic Coronary Syndrome - 2025.Arquivos brasileiros de cardiologia · 2025
    Article
  19. Endocrine enigmas: vascular health in females throughout the lifespan.American journal of physiology. Heart and circulatory physiology · 2025
    Review
  20. Review

259 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors.

C Noel Bairey MerzDivision of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, Cedars-Sinai Research Institute, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, California, USA. Noel.BaireyMerz@cshs.org
Leslee J Shaw
Steven E Reis
Vera Bittner
Sheryl F Kelsey
Marian Olson
B Delia Johnson
Carl J Pepine
Sunil Mankad
Barry L Sharaf
William J Rogers
Gerald M Pohost
Amir Lerman
Arshed A Quyyumi
George Sopko
WISE Investigators

Funding

ZONA-FREE HAMSTER OVA ASSAY AS AN INDICATOR OF MALE FERTILITYM01RR000425 · LOS ANGELES COUNTY HARBOR-UCLA MED CTR · 1985 to 2005
$38.7M
ISCHEMIC HEART DISEASE IN WOMEN--CLINICAL CENTERN01HV068163 · UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA · 1996 to 2001
$386k
ISCHEMIC HEART DISEASE IN WOMEN-CLINICAL CENTERN01HV068161 · UNIVERSITY OF ALABAMA AT BIRMINGHAM · 1996 to 2000
$245k
EVAL OF ISCHEMIC HEART DISEASE IN WOMEN-CLINICAL CTR-N01HV68162-268068162N01HV068162 · UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH AT PITTSBURGH · 1996 to 2005
EVAL OF ISCHEMIC HEART DISEASE IN WOMEN-CLINICAL CTRN01HV068164 · ALLEGHENY-SINGER RESEARCH INSTITUTE · 1996 to 2001
NCRR NIH HHS M01-RR00425NHLBI NIH HHS N01-HV-68161NHLBI NIH HHS N01-HV-68162NHLBI NIH HHS N01-HV-68163NHLBI NIH HHS N01-HV-68164NHLBI NIH HHS U01 HL649141NHLBI NIH HHS U01 HL649241PHS HHS U0164829
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Coronary heart disease is the leading cause of death and disability in the U.S., but recent advances have not led to declines in case fatality rates for women. The current review highlights gender-specific issues in ischemic heart disease (IHD) presentation, evaluation, and outcomes with a special focus on the results derived from the National Institutes of Health-National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute-sponsored Women's Ischemia Syndrome Evaluation (WISE) study. In the second part of this review, we will assess new evidence on gender-based differences in vascular wall or metabolic alterations, atherosclerotic plaque deposition, and functional expression on worsening outcomes of women. Additionally, innovative cardiovascular imaging techniques will be discussed. Finally, we identify critical areas of further inquiry needed to advance this new gender-specific IHD understanding into improved outcomes for women.

Indexed as

AtherosclerosisCoronary DiseaseFemaleHumansMyocardial IschemiaPrognosisRisk AssessmentSex Factors

Identifiers

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.