Evidence map›Paper›PMID 16489473›Full record

ArticleEuropean journal of clinical pharmacology2006

Effects of atorvastatin on higher functions.

G P Parale, N N Baheti, P M Kulkarni, N V Panchal

Registry-linked trialAbstract readComparative StudyControlled Clinical Trial
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in European journal of clinical pharmacology, 2006. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT01186289 (Statin Therapy To Limit Cognitive Dysfunction After Cardiac Surgery), which is not on this map. Cited by 17 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
4.6field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT01186289 nawithdrawnnot on this mapstarted 2010, after this paper: background citation

Statin Therapy To Limit Cognitive Dysfunction After Cardiac Surgery

TypeinterventionalSponsorDuke UniversityRan2010 to 2012Enrolled0ConditionsNeurocognitive DysfunctionArmsatorvastatin
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 49 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Reversible dysphasia and statins.Journal of Korean medical science · 2012
    Article
  12. Article
  13. The effects of cholesterol on learning and memory.Neuroscience and biobehavioral reviews · 2010
    Review
  14. Promoting successful cognitive aging: a comprehensive review.Journal of Alzheimer's disease : JAD · 2010
    Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

G P ParaleDepartment of Medicine, Dr. VM Medical College Solapur, Maharashtra, India.
N N Baheti
P M Kulkarni
N V Panchal
Dr. V. M. Government Medical College · INSpan Diagnostics (India) · IN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveThis study was undertaken to assess the effects of atorvastatin on cognition and higher mental functions.

methodsIn this before and after comparison study with controls, group one included 55 subjects aged > or =40 years requiring statins for cardiovascular indications who were started on atorvastatin (10 mg/day). Group two assigned to receive placebo were men and women chosen from the same geographical area and matched for age, sex, education and presence of hypertension and diabetes mellitus. Assessment was done with the Mini-Mental State Examination, Digit Span, Picture Test (average and delayed), Trail Making Test, Controlled Oral Word Association Test, Digit Symbol Substitution Test and Auditory Vigilance and Digit Vigilance Test at baseline and after 6 months. Changes between baseline and 6 months in the above parameters of mental function were compared using suitable statistical tests in the atorvastatin and placebo groups. To limit experiment-wise error, performance scores were grouped into five cognitive domains, which were labeled as attention, psychomotor speed, mental flexibility, working memory and memory retrieval. Summary effect sizes were estimated as z-scores.

resultsBoth subjects on atorvastatin and placebo showed improvement in the majority of scales consistent with a learning effect on test performance. However, subjects treated with atorvastatin scored significantly over the placebo group in all domains, i.e. tests of attention [z-score=0.54, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.38-0.64, p=0.001], psychomotor speed (z-score=0.28, 95% CI: O.09-0.47, p<0.001), mental flexibility (z-score=0.27, 95% CI: 0.22-0.32, p=0.01), working memory (z-score=1.22, 95% CI: 0.93-1.50, p<0.001) and memory retrieval (z-score=0.59, 95% CI: 0.36-0.82, p<0.05).

conclusionThe present study concludes that there are significant beneficial effects of atorvastatin in a dose of 10 mg/day for a period of 6 months on higher functions as measured by the above standard neurocognitive tests.

Indexed as

AtorvastatinCardiovascular DiseasesCognitionFemaleHeptanoic AcidsHumansIntelligence TestsMaleMental ProcessesMiddle AgedPyrrolesTreatment OutcomeAtorvastatinHeptanoic AcidsPyrroles

Identifiers

PMID16489473
OpenAlexW2029762364

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.