ArticleCurrent cardiology reports2006
Comparison of warfarin and aspirin for symptomatic intracranial arterial stenosis.
Article in Current cardiology reports, 2006. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05001984 (Trial of PCSK9 Inhibition in Patients with Acute Stroke and Symptomatic Intracranial Atherosclerosis - a Prospective, Randomized, Open-label, Blinded End-point Study with High-resolution MR Vessel Wall Imaging), which is not on this map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Trial of PCSK9 Inhibition in Patients with Acute Stroke and Symptomatic Intracranial Atherosclerosis - a Prospective, Randomized, Open-label, Blinded End-point Study with High-resolution MR Vessel Wall Imaging
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.
- Has collateral blood flow any effect on restenosis rate? Our experience.Frontiers in neurology · 2024Article
- Intracranial arterial dolichoectasia and skull damage in a girl with Jaffe-Campanacci syndrome: a case report.Child's nervous system : ChNS : official journal of the International Society for Pediatric Neurosurgery · 2019Article
- Intracranial atherosclerotic disease; current options for surgical or medical treatment.Journal of Korean Neurosurgical Society · 2007Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.
Identifiers
16507227W2407228499What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.