ReviewJAMA2006
Assessing glycemia in diabetes using self-monitoring blood glucose and hemoglobin A1c.
Review in JAMA, 2006. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 103 papers, 7 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
103 citing papers in PubMed, 7 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 371 citations in OpenAlex.
- The association of glycemic level and prevalence of tuberculosis: a meta-analysis.BMC endocrine disorders · 2021Pooled it
- The Effect of Diacerein on Type 2 Diabetic Mellitus: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials with Trial Sequential Analysis.Journal of diabetes research · 2020Pooled it
- The Impact of Physical Activity on Glycemic Variability Assessed by Continuous Glucose Monitoring in Patients With Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus: A Systematic Review.Frontiers in endocrinology · 2020Pooled it
- Effects of Preoperative HbA1c Levels on the Postoperative Outcomes of Coronary Artery Disease Surgical Treatment in Patients with Diabetes Mellitus and Nondiabetic Patients: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Journal of diabetes research · 2020Pooled it
- Association of Elevated Pre-operative Hemoglobin A1c and Post-operative Complications in Non-diabetic Patients: A Systematic Review.World journal of surgery · 2018Pooled it
- Pooled it
- Systematic review: comparative effectiveness and safety of premixed insulin analogues in type 2 diabetes.Annals of internal medicine · 2008Pooled it
- Hospital discharge algorithm based on admission HbA1c for the management of patients with type 2 diabetes.Diabetes care · 2014Trial
- Chinese herbal medicine for impaired glucose tolerance: a randomized placebo controlled trial.BMC complementary and alternative medicine · 2013Trial
- Rapid improvement of glycemic control in type 2 diabetes using weekly intensive multifactorial interventions: structured glucose monitoring, patient education, and adjustment of therapy-a randomized controlled trial.Diabetes technology & therapeutics · 2011Trial
- Assessing glycemia in type 1 diabetic patients using a microdialysis system for continuous glucose monitoring.Annals of Saudi medicineTrial
- Article
- Impact of national reimbursement policy supporting test strips on glycemic control in people with insulin-treated diabetes: retrospective cohort study.BMC public health · 2025Article
- Diabetes and total knee arthroplasty: A nationwide analysis of complications, hospitalization outcomes and revision burden.Knee surgery, sports traumatology, arthroscopy : official journal of the ESSKA · 2025Article
- A Simple Experimental Approach to Understanding the Formation of Advanced Glycation End Products.Cureus · 2025Article
- A new perspective of blood routine test for the prediction and diagnosis of hyperglycemia.BMC endocrine disorders · 2025Article
- Cutoff Values for Glycated Albumin, 1,5-Anhydroglucitol, and Fructosamine as Alternative Markers for Hyperglycemia.Journal of clinical laboratory analysis · 2024Article
- Differential Rates of Glycation Following Exposure to Unique Monosaccharides.International journal of molecular sciences · 2024Article
- Article
- Determinants of health and mortality in undiagnosed diabetes: A nationally representative US adult, 2011-2020.Diabetes research and clinical practice · 2024Article
43 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
contextWith the increasing prevalence of diabetes, successful management of blood glucose control is increasingly important. Current approaches to assessing glycemia include the use of self-monitoring of blood glucose (SMBG) and hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c).
objectivesTo assess the evidence underlying the use of these 2 modalities, to evaluate confounders and sources of error in each test, to describe upcoming developments, and to reach evidence-based conclusions on their optimal use. DATA SOURCES, STUDY SELECTION, AND DATA EXTRACTION: Reports identified from MEDLINE searches (1976-2005) using relevant terms were selected for quality and relevance to the stated questions. Particular attention was paid to larger cohort studies, clinical trials, meta-analyses, and established recommendations. DATA SYNTHESIS: If used properly SMBG gives an acceptably accurate reflection of immediate plasma glucose levels. Study results vary, but in general, the evidence supports a positive effect of regular SMBG for improving glycemia, particularly in individuals treated with insulin. The best timing of SMBG and its frequency are controversial issues, but the clinical recommendation is for regular monitoring with frequency depending on the treatment and the instability of glycemia. In the relatively near term, SMBG could gradually be replaced by continuous glucose monitoring. HbA1c measures long-term glycemic control, reflecting a time-weighted mean over the previous 3 to 4 months. There are a number of physiologic and methodologic confounders that can affect HbA1c, but standardization of assays has been well established. The main value of HbA1c is its use as a predictor of diabetic complications and the proven effect of improved control of HbA1c on complication risk. A reasonable target value for HbA1c is less than 7%. A new method for measuring HbA1c may cause significant changes in the recommended levels, the numbers reported, and even the name of the test.
conclusionAssessing glycemia in diabetes can be a challenge, but approaches are available that promote successful management of blood glucose and may thereby lead to a significant reduction in morbidity and mortality related to diabetes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.