Evidence map›Paper›PMID 16682865›Full record

ArticleEating and weight disorders : EWD2005

Psychometric properties of the eating attitudes test and children's eating attitudes test in Croatia.

N Ambrosi-Randić, A Pokrajac-Bulian

Registry-linked trialAbstract readValidation Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Eating and weight disorders : EWD, 2005. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06243536 (The Effect of Semaglutide on Disordered Eating Behaviour in Type 2 Diabetic Patients), which is not on this map. Cited by 20 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.8field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT06243536 phase4unknown statusstarted 2024, after this paper: background citation

The Effect of Semaglutide on Disordered Eating Behaviour in Type 2 Diabetic Patients

Ran2024Enrolled60Registered outcomes3Posted comparisons0ConditionsDisordered Eating Behaviors, Overweight, Type 2 DiabetesArmssemaglutide, Standard of care
Open the trial in the graph
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 42 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

N Ambrosi-RandićFaculty of Philosophy, Pula, Croatia.
A Pokrajac-Bulian
University of Rijeka · HR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The factor structure of the children's version of the Eating Attitudes Test (ChEAT) and Eating Attitudes Test (EAT-26) were examined in Croatian girls of different ages. A self-report survey was given to 225 girls (Grades 5 to 8), 525 high school girls (Grades 9 to 12), and 646 female university students. Factor analysis revealed the existence of four factors for ChEAT, and three interpretable factors for EAT-26. Internal consistency of both instruments was satisfactory. 10.3% of school girls scored 20 or higher on ChEAT, when 7.6% of high school girls and 11.3% of university students had elevated EAT-26 scores. The ChEAT and EAT-26 were useful for screening large non-clinical groups and measuring disturbed eating behaviours. Those with elevated ChEAT and EAT-26 scores were more likely than those with lower scores to be engaged in extreme weight control methods (e.g. vomiting, binging).

Indexed as

AdolescentAdultChildChild BehaviorCroatiaFeeding and Eating DisordersFeeding BehaviorFemaleHumansMass ScreeningPsychometricsReproducibility of Results

Identifiers

PMID16682865
OpenAlexW2017981045

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.