ArticleJournal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI2006
Determination of cardiac volumes and mass with FLASH and SSFP cine sequences at 1.5 vs. 3 Tesla: a validation study.
Article in Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI, 2006. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 2 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 33 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Canagliflozin Attenuates CMR-Quantified Myocardial Fibrosis in Patients With Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus at High Cardiovascular Risk
Cardiac Allograft Remodeling and Effects of Sirolimus on Its Progression
Who cites it
33 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 86 citations in OpenAlex.
- Variation in left ventricular cardiac magnetic resonance normal reference ranges: systematic review and meta-analysis.European heart journal. Cardiovascular Imaging · 2021Pooled it
- Daily remote ischaemic conditioning following acute myocardial infarction: a randomised controlled trial.Heart (British Cardiac Society) · 2018Trial
- Oral Coenzyme Q10 supplementation does not prevent cardiac alterations during a high altitude trek to everest base cAMP.High altitude medicine & biology · 2014Trial
- Cardiac function and myocardial strain analysis at 7T using B1 shimming in comparison to 3T magnetic resonance imaging.The international journal of cardiovascular imaging · 2026Article
- Evaluation of left ventricular and left atrial volumetric function from native MR multislice 4D flow magnitude data.European radiology · 2024Article
- Coexistent Diabetes Is Associated With the Presence of Adverse Phenotypic Features in Patients With Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy.Diabetes care · 2022Article
- Society for Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance/European Society of Cardiovascular Imaging/American Society of Echocardiography/Society for Pediatric Radiology/North American Society for Cardiovascular Imaging Guidelines for the use of cardiovascular magnetic resonance in pediatric congenital and acquired heart disease : Endorsed by The American Heart Association.Journal of cardiovascular magnetic resonance : official journal of the Society for Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance · 2022Review
- Society for Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance/European Society of Cardiovascular Imaging/American Society of Echocardiography/Society for Pediatric Radiology/North American Society for Cardiovascular Imaging Guidelines for the Use of Cardiac Magnetic Resonance in Pediatric Congenital and Acquired Heart Disease: Endorsed by The American Heart Association.Circulation. Cardiovascular imaging · 2022Review
- Coronary microvascular function and visceral adiposity in patients with normal body weight and type 2 diabetes.Obesity (Silver Spring, Md.) · 2022Article
- Bi-ventricular assessment with cardiovascular magnetic resonance at 5 Tesla: A pilot study.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2022Article
- Prospective Longitudinal Characterization of the Relationship between Diabetes and Cardiac Structural and Functional Changes.Cardiology research and practice · 2022Article
- Observational
- Cardiovascular Effects of Unilateral Nephrectomy in Living Kidney Donors at 5 Years.Hypertension (Dallas, Tex. : 1979) · 2021Article
- Cardiovascular magnetic resonance normal values in children for biventricular wall thickness and mass.Journal of cardiovascular magnetic resonance : official journal of the Society for Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance · 2021Article
- Cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging for structural heart disease.Cardiovascular diagnosis and therapy · 2020Review
- Male sex adversely affects the phenotypic expression of diabetic heart disease.Therapeutic advances in endocrinology and metabolism · 2020Article
- Marked variation in heritability estimates of left ventricular mass depending on modality of measurement.Scientific reports · 2019Article
- Feature-tracking myocardial strain in healthy adults- a magnetic resonance study at 3.0 tesla.Scientific reports · 2019Article
- Introduction to a mechanism for automated myocardium boundary detection with displacement encoding with stimulated echoes (DENSE).The British journal of radiology · 2018Article
- Contribution of mitral valve leaflet length and septal wall thickness to outflow tract obstruction in patients with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy.The international journal of cardiovascular imaging · 2017Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
purposeTo compare cardiac cine MR imaging using steady state free precession (SSFP) and fast low angle shot (FLASH) techniques at 1.5 and 3 T, and to establish their variabilities and reproducibilities for cardiac volume and mass determination in volunteers. To assess the feasibility of SSFP imaging in patients at 3 T and to determine comparability to volume data acquired at 1.5 T. MATERIALS AND
methodsTen healthy volunteers underwent cardiac magnetic resonance imaging using SSFP and segmented gradient-echo FLASH, using both a 1.5 and a 3 T MR system on the same day. Ten patients with impaired left ventricular (LV) function were also studied at both field strengths with SSFP.
resultsFor both SSFP and FLASH, field strength had no effect on the quantification of LV and right ventricular (RV) volumes, mass, or function (P > or = 0.05 for field strength for all parameters). At both 1.5 and 3 T, SSFP yielded smaller LV mass (e.g., at 3 T 109 +/- 30 g vs. 142 +/- 37 g; P = 0.011) and larger LV volume (e.g., at 3 T end-diastolic volume 149 +/- 37 mL vs. 133 +/- 31 mL at 5 T; P = 0.041) measurements than FLASH. In patients with reduced LV function, all volume and mass measurements were again similar for SSFP sequences at 1.5 vs. 3 T. In volunteers and patients, measurement variabilities for LV parameters were small for both field strength and sequences, ranging between 3.7% and 10.7% for mass.
conclusionCompared to 1.5 T, cardiac cine MR imaging at 3 T, using either FLASH or SSFP sequences, is feasible and highly reproducible. Field strength does not have an influence on quantification of cardiac volume or mass, but the systematic overestimation of LV mass and underestimation of LV volume by FLASH compared to SSFP is present at both 1.5 and 3 T. Normal values for cardiac volumes and mass established at 1.5 T can be applied to scans obtained at 3 T.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.