ArticleBritish journal of clinical pharmacology2007
Impact of adherence to statins on coronary artery disease in primary prevention.
Article in British journal of clinical pharmacology, 2007. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 35 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
35 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 98 citations in OpenAlex.
- The burden of non-adherence to cardiovascular medications among the aging population in Australia: a meta-analysis.Drugs & aging · 2015Pooled it
- Impact of statin adherence on cardiovascular disease and mortality outcomes: a systematic review.British journal of clinical pharmacology · 2014Pooled it
- Predictors of nonadherence to statins: a systematic review and meta-analysis.The Annals of pharmacotherapy · 2010Pooled it
- Implementation of a patient-centred complex intervention to improve Initial Medication Adherence to cardiovascular disease and diabetes treatments in primary care (the IMA-cRCT study): a mixed-methods process evaluation.BMJ quality & safety · 2026Trial
- Long-term statin treatment in children with familial hypercholesterolemia: more insight into tolerability and adherence.Paediatric drugs · 2015Trial
- The Complex Interplay Between Dyslipidemic Subjects Living with Type 2 Diabetes and Metabolic Syndrome and Statin Treatment: A Reflection on Adherence and Persistence in the Real World.Diabetes therapy : research, treatment and education of diabetes and related disorders · 2026Article
- Article
- The Dynamics of Cardiovascular Risk-An Analysis of the Prospective Urban Rural Epidemiology (PURE) Poland Cohort Study.Journal of clinical medicine · 2024Article
- Challenges in Improving Adherence to Diet and Drug Treatment in Hypercholesterolemia Patients.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2023Review
- Article
- Article
- Improving Initial Medication Adherence to cardiovascular disease and diabetes treatments in primary care: Pilot trial of a complex intervention.Frontiers in public health · 2022Article
- Article
- Adherence to statins and its impact on clinical outcomes: a retrospective population-based study in China.BMC cardiovascular disorders · 2020Article
- Initiation and Single Dispensing in Cardiovascular and Insulin Medications: Prevalence and Explanatory Factors.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2020Article
- Willingness to be Reinitiated on a Statin (from the REasons for Geographic and Racial Differences in Stroke Study).The American journal of cardiology · 2018Article
- Risk factors control for primary prevention of cardiovascular disease in men: Evidence from the Aragon Workers Health Study (AWHS).PloS one · 2018Article
- Relationships between Medication Adherence and Cardiovascular Disease Risk Factor Control in Elderly Patients with Diabetes.Pharmacotherapy · 2017Article
- Antihyperlipidemic Medication Treatment Patterns and Statin Adherence Among Patients with ASCVD in a Managed Care Plan After Release of the 2013 ACC/AHA Guideline on the Treatment of Blood Cholesterol.Journal of managed care & specialty pharmacy · 2016Article
- Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
aimsTo evaluate the impact of adherence to statins on nonfatal coronary artery disease (CAD). Statins reduce cardiovascular morbidity and mortality after 1-2 years of continuous treatment. Studies have shown that <40% of patients take > or =80% of prescribed doses 1 year after starting therapy and that approximately half discontinue medication within 6 months of starting therapy.
methodsA cohort of 20 543 patients was reconstructed using the Régie de l'assurance maladie du Québec databases. Patients aged 50-64 years, without cardiovascular disease, and newly treated with statins between 1998 and 2000 were eligible. A nested case-control design was used to study nonfatal CAD. Every case was matched with 20 randomly selected controls. The adherence level was defined as the percentage of the prescribed medication doses used over a specified period and classified as > or =90% or <90%. Rate ratios (RR) of nonfatal CAD were determined through conditional logistic regression adjusted for age, sex, socioeconomic status, diabetes and hypertension.
resultsThe mean patient age was 58 years, 45% had hypertension and 19% had diabetes. Men represented 37% of the cohort. Among patients followed for >1 year, adherence of > or =90% was associated with fewer nonfatal CAD events (RR 0.81; 0.67, 0.97) compared with adherence <90%. In the multivariate model, male gender (RR 1.37; 1.16, 1.63), welfare recipients (RR 1.24; 1.04, 1.48), newly diagnosed hypertension (RR 3.54; 2.62, 4.77) and newly diagnosed diabetes mellitus (RR 1.97; 1.20, 3.24) were risk factors for CAD.
conclusionThe incidence of nonfatal CAD events decreases when >90% of the prescribed medications is used over at least 1 year.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.