Evidence map›Paper›PMID 17486328›Full record

Trial reportEuropean journal of clinical pharmacology2007

The influence of hepatic impairment on the pharmacokinetics of the dipeptidyl peptidase IV (DPP-4) inhibitor vildagliptin.

Y-L He, R Sabo, J Campestrini, Y Wang, M Ligueros-Saylan, K C Lasseter, S C Dilzer, D Howard, W P Dole

Abstract readClinical TrialComparative Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Trial report in European journal of clinical pharmacology, 2007. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
4.6field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 64 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Choosing a gliptin.Indian journal of endocrinology and metabolism · 2011
    Article
  13. Review
  14. Emerging treatment options for type 2 diabetes.British journal of clinical pharmacology · 2010
    Review
  15. Review
  16. Incretin-based therapies in type 2 diabetes mellitus.The Journal of clinical endocrinology and metabolism · 2008
    Review
  17. Vildagliptin: a new oral treatment for type 2 diabetes mellitus.Vascular health and risk management · 2008
    Review
  18. Article
  19. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.

Y-L HeExploratory Development, Novartis Institutes for Biomedical Research, Inc., 400 Technology Square, Building 605, Rm 819, Cambridge, MA 02139-3584, USA. yanling.he@novartis.co.
R Sabo
J Campestrini
Y Wang
M Ligueros-Saylan
K C Lasseter
S C Dilzer
D Howard
W P Dole
Novartis (United States) · USNovartis (Switzerland) · CHPharmaceutical Product Development (United States) · USNovartis (France) · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveVildagliptin is a potent and selective dipeptidyl peptidase-IV (DPP-4) inhibitor that improves glycemic control in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus by increasing alpha- and beta-cell responsiveness to glucose. This study investigated the pharmacokinetics of vildagliptin in patients with hepatic impairment compared with healthy subjects.

methodsThis was an open-label, parallel-group study in patients with mild (n = 6), moderate (n = 6) or severe (n = 4) hepatic impairment and healthy subjects (n = 6). All subjects received a single 100-mg oral dose of vildagliptin, and plasma concentrations of vildagliptin and its main pharmacologically inactive metabolite LAY151 were measured up to 36 h post-dose.

resultsExposure to vildagliptin (AUC(0-infinity) and C(max)) decreased non-significantly by 20 and 30%, respectively, in patients with mild hepatic impairment [geometric mean ratio (90% CI): AUC(0-infinity), 0.80 (0.60, 1.06), p = 0.192; C(max), 0.70 (0.46, 1.05), p = 0.149]. Exposure to vildagliptin was also decreased non-significantly in patients with moderate hepatic impairment [-8% for AUC(0-infinity), geometric mean ratio (90% CI): 0.92 (0.69, 1.23), p = 0.630; -23% for C(max), geometric mean ratio (90% CI): 0.77 (0.51, 1.17), p = 0.293]. In patients with severe hepatic impairment, C(max) was 6% lower than that in healthy subjects [geometric mean ratio (90% CI): 0.94 (0.59, 1.49), p = 0.285], whereas AUC(0-infinity) was increased by 22% [geometric mean ratio (90% CI): 1.22 (0.89, 1.68), p = 0.816). Across the hepatic impairment groups, LAY151 AUC(0-infinity) and C(max) were increased by 29-84% and 24-63%, respectively, compared with healthy subjects. The single 100-mg oral dose of vildagliptin was well tolerated by patients with hepatic impairment.

conclusionsThere was no significant difference in exposure to vildagliptin in patients with mild, moderate or severe hepatic impairment; therefore, no dose adjustment of vildagliptin is necessary in patients with hepatic impairment.

Indexed as

Dipeptidyl-Peptidase IV InhibitorsAdamantaneAdultAnalysis of VarianceArea Under CurveChronic DiseaseDipeptidyl Peptidase 4FemaleHumansHypoglycemic AgentsLiver DiseasesMaleMiddle AgedNitrilesPyrrolidinesVildagliptinAdamantaneDipeptidyl Peptidase 4Dipeptidyl-Peptidase IV InhibitorsDPP4 protein, humanHypoglycemic AgentsNitrilesPyrrolidinesVildagliptin

Identifiers

PMID17486328
OpenAlexW2042457844

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.