Evidence mapPaperPMID 17520238Full record

Trial reportDiabetologia2007

Effects of peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor (PPAR)-alpha and PPAR-gamma agonists on glucose and lipid metabolism in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus.

M Bajaj, S Suraamornkul, L J Hardies, L Glass, N Musi, R A DeFronzo

Open access · bronzeAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Trial report in Diabetologia, 2007. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 58 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
58citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.1field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

58 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 137 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Trial
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

M BajajDiabetes Division, Department of Medicine, University of Texas Health Science Center, San Antonio, TX, USA. mandeepbajaj@hotmail.com
S Suraamornkul
L J Hardies
L Glass
N Musi
R A DeFronzo
The University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio · USBaylor College of Medicine · US

Funding

ZOLEDRONATE VS AREDIA IN MULTIPLE MYELOMA/BREAST CANCER W /BONE DISORDERSM01RR001346 · UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS HLTH SCI CTR SAN ANT · 1985 to 2005
$16.1M
SGLT2 Inhibitors, Ketogenesis, and KetoacidosisR01DK024092 · NIDDK · YALE UNIVERSITY · 1986 to 2025
$3.6M
Regulation of Hepatic and Peripheral Glucose MetabolismR56DK024092 · UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS HLTH SCI CTR SAN ANT · 2005 to 2005
$73k
NCRR NIH HHS M01 RR 01346NIDDK NIH HHS DK 24092
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aims/hypothesisThe aim of the study was to examine the effects of pioglitazone (PIO), a peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor (PPAR)-gamma agonist, and fenofibrate (FENO), a PPAR-alpha agonist, as monotherapy and in combination on glucose and lipid metabolism. SUBJECTS AND

methodsFifteen type 2 diabetic patients received FENO (n = 8) or PIO (n = 7) for 3 months, followed by the addition of the other agent for 3 months in an open-label study. Subjects received a 4 h hyperinsulinaemic-euglycaemic clamp and a hepatic fat content measurement at 0, 3 and 6 months.

resultsFollowing PIO, fasting plasma glucose (FPG) (p < 0.05) and HbA(1c) (p < 0.01) decreased, while plasma adiponectin (AD) (5.5 +/- 0.9 to 13.8 +/- 3.5 microg/ml [SEM], p < 0.03) and the rate of insulin-stimulated total-body glucose disposal (R (d)) (23.8 +/- 3.8 to 40.5 +/- 4.4 micromol kg(-1) min(-1), p < 0.005) increased. After FENO, FPG, HbA(1c), AD and R (d) did not change. PIO reduced fasting NEFA (784 +/- 53 to 546 +/- 43 micromol/l, p < 0.05), triacylglycerol (2.12 +/- 0.28 to 1.61 +/- 0.22 mmol/l, p < 0.05) and hepatic fat content (20.4 +/- 4.8 to 10.2 +/- 2.5%, p < 0.02). Following FENO, fasting NEFA and hepatic fat content did not change, while triacylglycerol decreased (2.20 +/- 0.14 to 1.59 +/- 0.13 mmol/l, p < 0.01). Addition of FENO to PIO had no effect on R (d), FPG, HbA(1c), NEFA, hepatic fat content or AD, but triacylglycerol decreased (1.61 +/- 0.22 to 1.00 +/- 0.15 mmol/l, p < 0.05). Addition of PIO to FENO increased R (d) (24.9 +/- 4.4 to 36.1 +/- 2.2 micromol kg(-1) min(-1), p < 0.005) and AD (4.1 +/- 0.8 to 13.1 +/- 2.5 microg/ml, p < 0.005) and reduced FPG (p < 0.05), HbA(1c) (p < 0.05), NEFA (p < 0.01), hepatic fat content (18.3 +/- 3.1 to 13.5 +/- 2.1%, p < 0.03) and triacylglycerol (1.59 +/- 0.13 to 0.96 +/- 0.9 mmol/l, p < 0.01). Muscle adenosine 5'-monophosphate-activated protein kinase (AMPK) activity did not change following FENO; following the addition of PIO, muscle AMPK activity increased significantly (phosphorylated AMPK:total AMPK ratio 1.2 +/- 0.2 to 2.2 +/- 0.3, p < 0.01). CONCLUSIONS/

interpretationWe conclude that PPAR-alpha therapy has no effect on NEFA or glucose metabolism and that addition of a PPAR-alpha agonist to a PPAR-gamma agent causes a further decrease in plasma triacylglycerol, but has no effect on NEFA or glucose metabolism.

Indexed as

AdiponectinAMP-Activated Protein KinasesBlood GlucoseDiabetes Mellitus, Type 2Drug Therapy, CombinationFemaleFenofibrateGlucoseHumansHypoglycemic AgentsInsulinInsulin ResistanceLipid MetabolismLiverMaleMiddle AgedAdiponectinAMP-Activated Protein KinasesBlood GlucoseFenofibrateGlucoseHypoglycemic AgentsInsulinMultienzyme ComplexesPioglitazonePPAR alphaPPAR gammaProtein Serine-Threonine KinasesThiazolidinediones

Identifiers

PMID17520238
OpenAlexW2021208588

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.