ReviewEndocrine pathology2006
Molecular and cellular biology of pheochromocytomas and extra-adrenal paragangliomas.
Review in Endocrine pathology, 2006. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed, 24 citations in OpenAlex.
- Circulating miRNA Increases the Diagnostic Accuracy of Chromogranin A in Metastatic Pancreatic Neuroendocrine Tumors.Cancers · 2020Article
- Article
- The molecular basis of blood pressure variation.Pediatric nephrology (Berlin, Germany) · 2013Review
- Age at diagnosis of pheochromocytoma differs according to catecholamine phenotype and tumor location.The Journal of clinical endocrinology and metabolism · 2011Article
- Catecholamine metabolomic and secretory phenotypes in phaeochromocytoma.Endocrine-related cancer · 2011Article
- Advances in biochemical screening for phaeochromocytoma using biogenic amines.The Clinical biochemist. Reviews · 2009Article
- Adrenergic differentiation and Ret expression in rat pheochromocytomas.Endocrine pathology · 2008Article
- Stathmin expression in pheochromocytomas, paragangliomas, and in other endocrine tumors.Endocrine pathology · 2008Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Efforts to understand the pathobiology of pheochromocytomas and extra-adrenal paragangliomas have been spurred by genetic and gene expression profiling studies showing genotype-phenotype correlations in familial pheochromocytoma/paraganglioma syndromes and in some sporadic tumors. The current challenge is to relate catalogs of genetic and phenotypic markers to cell biology. Hypothetical bases for genotype-phenotype correlations include: cell of origin, pathway dependence, and functional and anatomic context. A further consideration is phenotype plasticity. Cross talk between signaling pathways provides a general framework for understanding how mutations of apparently unrelated genes might lead to the same type of tumor, and also suggests that targeted therapies might be directed either at a specific mutated gene or a downstream signal transducer. However, precise mechanisms of tumorigenesis remain unknown. An intriguing hypothesis proposes that mutations of RET, NF1, VHL, or SDH predispose to hereditary pheochromocytoma/ paraganglioma by causing defective apoptotic culling of cells that would normally be destroyed during embryogenesis. An argument favoring survival rather than mitogenesis as a common denominator is that the same mutations are rare in sporadic pheochromocytomas/paragangliomas, suggesting they only need to act during a limited developmental window. An implication is that tumor precursors could be identified and eradicated in individuals who carry the mutations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.