Trial reportDer Chirurg; Zeitschrift fur alle Gebiete der operativen Medizen2007
[Port stapling for simplified port implantation in laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding].
Trial report in Der Chirurg; Zeitschrift fur alle Gebiete der operativen Medizen, 2007. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Own experience improving port implantation in laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding.Wideochirurgia i inne techniki maloinwazyjne = Videosurgery and other miniinvasive techniques · 2012Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe purpose of this study was to evaluate the applicability of a port stapling device to simplify and improve port implantation in laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding (LAGB).
methodsFrom November 2005 to September 2006, a prospective study was conducted on 23 consecutive patients who underwent LAGB with Swedish adjustable gastric banding. Patients were randomized to either conventional titanium-port implantation or port stapling using the "Velocity" device.
resultsNo differences in age, body weight, body mass index, fascia depth or incision length were reported between the groups. Port implantation time was significantly less using port stapling (90+/-24 s) compared to conventional port implantation (521+/-138 s). Port related complaints postoperatively and at follow-up were equal in both groups.
conclusionsPort stapling is an excellent tool to facilitate port implantation, particularly in massively obese patients with a thick abdominal wall.
Indexed as
Identifiers
17565476What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.