ReviewJAMA2007
Prescription drug cost sharing: associations with medication and medical utilization and spending and health.
Review in JAMA, 2007. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 291 papers, 10 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
291 citing papers in PubMed, 10 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 873 citations in OpenAlex.
- Association between anxiety disorders and medication adherence in patients with cardiovascular disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis of observational studies.BMC psychiatry · 2025Pooled it
- Cost-sharing and adherence, clinical outcomes, health care utilization, and costs: A systematic literature review.Journal of managed care & specialty pharmacy · 2023Pooled it
- A systematic umbrella review of the association of prescription drug insurance and cost-sharing with drug use, health services use, and health.BMC health services research · 2022Pooled it
- Cost-related medication nonadherence in Canada: a systematic review of prevalence, predictors, and clinical impact.Systematic reviews · 2021Pooled it
- American Society for Enhanced Recovery and Perioperative Quality Initiative-4 Joint Consensus Statement on Persistent Postoperative Opioid Use: Definition, Incidence, Risk Factors, and Health Care System Initiatives.Anesthesia and analgesia · 2019Pooled it
- Insulin Access and Affordability Working Group: Conclusions and Recommendations.Diabetes care · 2018Guideline
- How does copayment for health care services affect demand, health and redistribution? A systematic review of the empirical evidence from 1990 to 2011.The European journal of health economics : HEPAC : health economics in prevention and care · 2014Pooled it
- Interventions to improve safe and effective medicines use by consumers: an overview of systematic reviews.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2014Pooled it
- Association between drug insurance cost sharing strategies and outcomes in patients with chronic diseases: a systematic review.PloS one · 2014Pooled it
- Pooled it
- Impact of removing prescription co-payments on the use of costly health services: a pragmatic randomised controlled trial.BMC health services research · 2023Trial
- Recruiting people facing social disadvantage: the experience of the Free Meds study.International journal for equity in health · 2021Trial
- Trial
- A randomized controlled trial of negative co-payments: the CHORD trial.The American journal of managed care · 2015Trial
- A randomized controlled trial of co-payment elimination: the CHORD trial.The American journal of managed care · 2015Trial
- The Washington State Prescription Drug Affordability Board's selection of drugs for affordability review.Journal of managed care & specialty pharmacy · 2026Article
- Price transparency & out-of-pocket payments for medications: Implications of associated delivery fees in the United States.Health policy OPEN · 2026Article
- The 6-item InCharge financial distress/financial wellbeing (IFDFW-6) scale: Development and validation in pharmacy and epidemiology research.Exploratory research in clinical and social pharmacy · 2026Article
- How lack of subsidized prescription drug coverage affects medication use by low-income Medicare beneficiaries.Health affairs scholar · 2026Article
- Out-of-Pocket Costs and Antidepressant Adherence in Head and Neck Cancer Survivors.Psycho-oncology · 2026Article
231 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
contextPrescription drugs are instrumental to managing and preventing chronic disease. Recent changes in US prescription drug cost sharing could affect access to them.
objectiveTo synthesize published evidence on the associations among cost-sharing features of prescription drug benefits and use of prescription drugs, use of nonpharmaceutical services, and health outcomes. DATA SOURCES: We searched PubMed for studies published in English between 1985 and 2006. STUDY SELECTION AND DATA EXTRACTION: Among 923 articles found in the search, we identified 132 articles examining the associations between prescription drug plan cost-containment measures, including co-payments, tiering, or coinsurance (n = 65), pharmacy benefit caps or monthly prescription limits (n = 11), formulary restrictions (n = 41), and reference pricing (n = 16), and salient outcomes, including pharmacy utilization and spending, medical care utilization and spending, and health outcomes.
resultsIncreased cost sharing is associated with lower rates of drug treatment, worse adherence among existing users, and more frequent discontinuation of therapy. For each 10% increase in cost sharing, prescription drug spending decreases by 2% to 6%, depending on class of drug and condition of the patient. The reduction in use associated with a benefit cap, which limits either the coverage amount or the number of covered prescriptions, is consistent with other cost-sharing features. For some chronic conditions, higher cost sharing is associated with increased use of medical services, at least for patients with congestive heart failure, lipid disorders, diabetes, and schizophrenia. While low-income groups may be more sensitive to increased cost sharing, there is little evidence to support this contention.
conclusionsPharmacy benefit design represents an important public health tool for improving patient treatment and adherence. While increased cost sharing is highly correlated with reductions in pharmacy use, the long-term consequences of benefit changes on health are still uncertain.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.