Evidence map›Paper›PMID 17997129›Full record

ReviewCurrent opinion in microbiology2007

The cell biology of Trypanosoma brucei differentiation.

Katelyn Fenn, Keith R Matthews

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Current opinion in microbiology, 2007. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 87 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
87citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

87 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Single-cell RNA sequencing ofProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2020
    Article
  16. International journal of molecular sciences · 2019
    Article
  17. African trypanosomes expressing multiple VSGs are rapidly eliminated by the host immune system.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2019
    Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article

27 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Katelyn FennInstitute of Immunology and Infection Research, School of Biological Sciences, University of Edinburgh, Ashworth Laboratories, King's Buildings, West Mains Road, Edinburgh EH9 3JT, UK.
Keith R Matthews

Funding

Wellcome Trust 073358
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Developmental events in the life-cycle of the sleeping sickness parasite comprise integrated changes in cell morphology, metabolism, gene expression and signalling pathways. In each case these processes differ from the eukaryotic norm. In the past three years, understanding of these developmental processes has progressed from a description of the cytological events of differentiation to a discovery of its underlying molecular controls. With an expanding set of reagents for the identification of distinct parasite life-cycle stages in the tsetse, trypanosome differentiation is being studied from the molecular to the organismal and population level. Interestingly, the new molecular discoveries provide insights into the biology of the parasite in the field.

Indexed as

Life Cycle StagesAnimalsGene Expression RegulationProtozoan ProteinsTrypanosoma brucei bruceiTsetse FliesProtozoan Proteins

Identifiers

PMID17997129
PMCPMC3902322

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.