ReviewJournal of clinical hypertension (Greenwich, Conn.)2008
Hypertension control in the elderly.
Review in Journal of clinical hypertension (Greenwich, Conn.), 2008. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Effects of demographics on the antihypertensive efficacy of triple therapy with amlodipine, valsartan, and hydrochlorothiazide for moderate to severe hypertension.Current medical research and opinion · 2013Trial
- Trial
- The effects of an olmesartan medoxomil-based treatment algorithm on 24-hour blood pressure levels in elderly patients aged 65 and older.Journal of clinical hypertension (Greenwich, Conn.) · 2009Trial
- Efficacy of an olmesartan medoxomil-based treatment algorithm in patients stratified by age, race, or sex.Journal of clinical hypertension (Greenwich, Conn.) · 2010Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Hypertension is highly prevalent in older persons and most often presents as isolated systolic hypertension. Systolic blood pressure (BP) is a stronger predictor of risk than diastolic BP in persons older than 50 years. Most of these patients will require multiple drug therapies to achieve the substantial reductions in systolic BP needed to reach target levels. Clinical trials have demonstrated that antihypertensive therapy with beta-blockers and diuretics as well as with calcium channel blockers, angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors, and angiotensin II type 1 receptor blockers reduces cardiovascular risk in older patients. Studies examining safety and BP-lowering efficacy have shown that a renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system blocker plus a calcium channel blocker as well as a combination of diuretics and beta-blockers or diuretics plus an angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor or angiotensin II type 1 receptor blocker achieves greater BP reductions than monotherapy. Such multiple drug regimens are well tolerated in older patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.