SynthesisCMAJ : Canadian Medical Association journal = journal de l'Association medicale canadienne2008
The efficacy and safety of intensive statin therapy: a meta-analysis of randomized trials.
Synthesis in CMAJ : Canadian Medical Association journal = journal de l'Association medicale canadienne, 2008. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 55 papers, 9 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
55 citing papers in PubMed, 9 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 200 citations in OpenAlex.
- Comparative Muscle Tolerability of Different Types and Intensities of Statins: A Network Meta-Analysis of Double-Blind Randomized Controlled Trials.Cardiovascular drugs and therapy · 2024Pooled it
- PEER simplified lipid guideline 2023 update: Prevention and management of cardiovascular disease in primary care.Canadian family physician Medecin de famille canadien · 2023Guideline
- Effect of Intensive and Standard Lipid-Lowering Therapy on the Progression of Stroke in Patients With Coronary Artery Syndromes: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.Journal of cardiovascular pharmacology · 2020Pooled it
- Canadian Cardiovascular Harmonized National Guidelines Endeavour (C-CHANGE) guideline for the prevention and management of cardiovascular disease in primary care: 2018 update.CMAJ : Canadian Medical Association journal = journal de l'Association medicale canadienne · 2018Guideline
- The efficacy and safety of high-dose statins in acute phase of ischemic stroke and transient ischemic attack: a systematic review.Internal and emergency medicine · 2017Pooled it
- Simplified lipid guidelines: Prevention and management of cardiovascular disease in primary care.Canadian family physician Medecin de famille canadien · 2015Guideline
- Genetic factors affecting statin concentrations and subsequent myopathy: a HuGENet systematic review.Genetics in medicine : official journal of the American College of Medical Genetics · 2014Pooled it
- Efficacy and safety evaluation of intensive statin therapy in older patients with coronary heart disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis.European journal of clinical pharmacology · 2013Pooled it
- Secondary prevention of ischaemic cardiac events.BMJ clinical evidence · 2011Pooled it
- Immediate effect of intensive atorvastatin therapy on lipid parameters in patients with acute coronary syndrome.Lipids in health and disease · 2010Trial
- The Enhancing Secondary Prevention in Coronary Artery Disease trial.CMAJ : Canadian Medical Association journal = journal de l'Association medicale canadienne · 2009Trial
- Global Guidance for Dyslipidaemia Management in Adults: A Scoping Review.Global heart · 2025Article
- Statin-induced autoimmune myositis: a proposal of an "experience-based" diagnostic algorithm from the analysis of 69 patients.Internal and emergency medicine · 2023Article
- Identification of Secondary Prevention Patients Eligible for PCSK9 Inhibitors Therapy According to the Routine Clinical Practice in Spain.Advances in therapy · 2023Article
- Apolipoprotein A1 deficiency in mice primes bone marrow stem cells for T cell lymphopoiesis.Journal of cell science · 2022Article
- Associations of pre-hospital statin treatment with in-hospital outcomes and severity of coronary artery disease in patients with first acute coronary syndrome-findings from the CCC-ACS project.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2022Article
- Lipid goal attainment in post-acute coronary syndrome patients in China: Results from the 6-month real-world dyslipidemia international study II.Clinical cardiology · 2021 · on this mapObservational
- Role of LOX-1 (Lectin-Like Oxidized Low-Density Lipoprotein Receptor 1) as a Cardiovascular Risk Predictor: Mechanistic Insight and Potential Clinical Use.Arteriosclerosis, thrombosis, and vascular biology · 2021Review
- Role of Lipid-Lowering Therapy in Low-Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol Goal Attainment: Focus on Patients With Acute Coronary Syndrome.Journal of cardiovascular pharmacology · 2020Review
- Low-Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol Targets in Patients With Coronary Heart Disease in Extremadura (Spain): LYNX Registry.Cardiology research · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundRecent lipid guidelines recommend aggressive low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol lowering in patients with coronary artery disease. To clarify the evidence for this recommendation, we conducted a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials that compared different intensities of statin therapy.
methodsWe searched electronic databases (MEDLINE, EMBASE, Cochrane Central Registery of Controlled Trials, Web of Science) for randomized controlled trials published up to July 19, 2007, that compared statin regimens of different intensities in adults with coronary artery disease and that reported cardiovascular events or mortality. Data were pooled using random-effects models to calculate odds ratios (OR).
resultsA total of 7 trials (29 395 patients) were included. Compared with less intensive statin regimens, more intensive regimens further reduced LDL levels (0.72 mmol/L reduction, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.60-0.84 mmol/L), and reduced the risk of myocardial infarction (OR 0.83, 95% CI 0.77-0.91) and stroke (OR 0.82, 95% CI 0.71-0.95). Although there was no effect on mortality among patients with chronic coronary artery disease (OR 0.96, 95% CI 0.80-1.14), all-cause mortality was reduced among patients with acute coronary syndromes treated with more intensive statin regimens (OR 0.75, 95% CI 0.61-0.93). Compared with lower intensity regimens, more intensive regimens were associated with small absolute increases in rates of drug discontinuation (2.5%), elevated levels of aminotransferases (1%) and myopathy (0.5%), and there was no difference in noncardiovascular mortality. All 7 trials reported events by randomization arm rather than by LDL level achieved. About half of the patients treated with more intensive statin therapy did not achieve an LDL level of less than 2.0 mmol/L, and none of the trials tested combination therapies.
interpretationOur analysis supports the use of more intensive statin regimens in patients with established coronary artery disease. There is insufficient evidence to advocate treating to particular LDL targets, using combination lipid-lowering therapy to achieve these targets or for using more intensive regimens in patients without established coronary artery disease.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.