Evidence map›Paper›PMID 18378859›Full record

Trial reportHypertension (Dallas, Tex. : 1979)2008

Telemedicine home blood pressure measurements and progression of albuminuria in elderly people with diabetes.

Walter Palmas, Thomas G Pickering, Jeanne Teresi, Joseph E Schwartz, Lesley Field, Ruth S Weinstock, Steven Shea

Open access · bronzeAbstract readMulticenter StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Hypertension (Dallas, Tex. : 1979), 2008. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.8field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 19 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Remote Patient Monitoring via Non-Invasive Digital Technologies: A Systematic Review.Telemedicine journal and e-health : the official journal of the American Telemedicine Association · 2017
    Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. The statement on home blood pressure monitoring: a mild critique.Journal of clinical hypertension (Greenwich, Conn.) · 2008
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Walter PalmasDepartment of Medicine, Columbia University, New York, NY, USA. wp56@columbia.edu
Thomas G Pickering
Jeanne Teresi
Joseph E Schwartz
Lesley Field
Ruth S Weinstock
Steven Shea
New York State Psychiatric InstituteState University of New York · USJoslin Diabetes Center · USNew York Psychoanalytic Society and Institute · US

Funding

WORKSITE BLOOD PRESSURE STUDYP01HL047540 · NHLBI · WEILL MEDICAL COLLEGE OF CORNELL UNIV · PI SCHWARTZ, JOSEPH E · 1993 to 2014
$27.7M
NHLBI NIH HHS P01 HL047540PHS HHS 95-C-90998
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We assessed whether home blood pressure monitoring improved the prediction of progression of albuminuria when added to office measurements and compared it with ambulatory blood pressure monitoring in a multiethnic cohort of older people (n=392) with diabetes mellitus, without macroalbuminuria, participating in the telemedicine arm of the Informatics for Diabetes Education and Telemedicine Study. Albuminuria was assessed by measuring the spot urine albumin:creatinine ratio at baseline and annually for 3 years. The ambulatory sleep:wake systolic blood pressure ratio was categorized as dipping (ratio: < or =0.9), nondipping (ratio: >0.9 to 1.0), and nocturnal rise (ratio: >1.0). In a repeated-measures mixed linear model, after adjustment that included office pulse pressure, home pulse pressure was independently associated with a higher follow-up albumin:creatinine ratio (P=0.001). That association persisted (P=0.01) after adjusting for 24-hour pulse pressure and nocturnal rise, which were also independent predictors (P=0.02 and P=0.03, respectively). Cox proportional hazards models examined the progression of albuminuria (n=74) as defined by cutoff values used by clinicians. After the adjustment for office pulse pressure, the hazards ratio (95% CI) per 10-mm Hg increment of home pulse pressure was 1.34 (range: 1.1 to 1.7; P=0.01). Home pulse pressure was not an independent predictor in the model including ambulatory monitoring data; a nocturnal rise was the only independent predictor (P=0.035). Cox models built separately for home pulse pressure and ambulatory monitoring exhibited similar calibration and discrimination. In conclusion, nocturnal blood pressure elevation was the strongest predictor of worsening albuminuria. Home blood pressure measurements added to office measurements and may constitute an adequate substitute for ambulatory monitoring.

Indexed as

Blood Pressure Monitoring, AmbulatoryTelemedicineAgedAlbuminuriaBlack PeopleBlood PressureCircadian RhythmDiabetes Mellitus, Type 2Disease ProgressionFemaleHispanic or LatinoHumansHypertensionLinear ModelsLongitudinal StudiesMale

Identifiers

PMID18378859
PMCPMC3855674
OpenAlexW2157820367

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.