Evidence map›Paper›PMID 18535832›Full record

Trial reportInternational journal of colorectal disease2008

Experiences of two centers of bariatric surgery in the treatment of intragastrale band migration after gastric banding-the importance of the German multicenter observational study for quality assurance in obesity surgery 2005 and 2006.

C Stroh, U Hohmann, U Will, R Flade-Kuthe, B Herbig, S Höhne, H Köhler, P Pick, Th Horbach, R Weiner and 7 more

Abstract readClinical TrialComparative StudyMulticenter Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Trial report in International journal of colorectal disease, 2008. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
2.8field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 25 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Endoscopic management of post-bariatric surgery complications.World journal of gastrointestinal endoscopy · 2016
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Endoscopic management of gastric band erosions: a 7-year series of 14 patients.Canadian journal of surgery. Journal canadien de chirurgie · 2014
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Laparoscopic adjustable gastric band: 4-year experience and learning curve.JSLS : Journal of the Society of Laparoendoscopic Surgeons
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

17 authors at 10 institutions in 4 countries.

C StrohDepartment of General, Abdominal and Pediatric Surgery, Municipal Hospital Teaching Hospital of the Friedrich-Schiller University at Jena, Germany, Strasse des Friedens 122, 07548, Gera, Germany. Christine.Stroh@wkg.srh.de
U Hohmann
U Will
R Flade-Kuthe
B Herbig
S Höhne
H Köhler
P Pick
Th Horbach
R Weiner
S Wolff
H Lippert
A M Wolf
U Schmidt
F Meyer
Th Manger
Study Group "Obesity Surgery"
Friedrich Schiller University Jena · DEOtto-von-Guericke University Magdeburg · DEAesculap (United States) · USDiakonissenkrankenhaus · DEHerzog Hospital · ILKlinikum Bielefeld · DEKrankenhaus Sachsenhausen · DESchiller International University · FRSRH Wald-Klinikum Gera · DEUniversity Hospital Ulm · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAdjustable silicone gastric banding (ASGB) is an effective treatment in morbid obesity. Band migration is a long-term complication. Causes, clinical symptoms, timing and incidence are investigated in single centres only. In Germany, since January 1st, 2005, practice in bariatric surgery has been investigated in German prospective multicenter trial for quality assurance in obesity surgery. MATERIALS AND

methodsAll patients underwent ASGB in two centres of bariatric surgery in Germany were prospectively registered using a computer-based data form. Patients with band migration were retrospectively evaluated, in particular, causes and characteristics of its management. The results were correlated with data obtained from the German prospective multicentre trial.

resultsIn total, 493 patients were enrolled in the study from February 1995 to February 2007. The follow-up rate was 79.9% (mean follow-up time period, 78.7 months; range, 2-148 months). Fifteen patients (3.0%) developed migration. In 14 cases, migration occurred within the range of 30-86 months after implantation. In one case, migration occurred 10 months after repositioning of the band. In the German multicentre trial, 629 patients underwent surgery during 2005 and 827 patients in 2006. In both periods, 74.4% of the patients were female and 25.6% male. The most frequently performed operation was ASGB (46.8%) followed by Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (38.5%).

conclusionBand migration requires band removal. Different symptoms and complications influence the kind of band removal. Multicentre data were evident in the case of high long-term complication rate after ASGB. Data of the German multicentre trial show the trend from restrictive bariatric procedures to malabsorptive approach.

Indexed as

AdolescentAdultAgedBariatric SurgeryDevice RemovalEndoscopy, GastrointestinalFemaleFollow-Up StudiesForeign-Body MigrationGastroplastyGermanyHumansIncidenceMaleMiddle AgedObesity

Identifiers

PMID18535832
OpenAlexW2147022121

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.