Trial reportInternational journal of colorectal disease2008
Experiences of two centers of bariatric surgery in the treatment of intragastrale band migration after gastric banding-the importance of the German multicenter observational study for quality assurance in obesity surgery 2005 and 2006.
Trial report in International journal of colorectal disease, 2008. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed, 25 citations in OpenAlex.
- Novel Endoscopic Management of Eroding Laparoscopic Adjustable Gastric Band: A Case Series.Case reports in gastrointestinal medicine · 2018Article
- Endoscopic Removal of a Gastric Band Completely Migrated into the Gastric Cavity.GE Portuguese journal of gastroenterology · 2017Article
- Endoscopic management of post-bariatric surgery complications.World journal of gastrointestinal endoscopy · 2016Review
- Endoscopic removal of partially migrated intragastric bands following surgical gastroplasty: a prospective case series.Obesity surgery · 2015Article
- Endoscopic management of gastric band erosions: a 7-year series of 14 patients.Canadian journal of surgery. Journal canadien de chirurgie · 2014Article
- "Management of gastric perforations during laparoscopic gastric banding" by Boris Kirshtein et al.Obesity surgery · 2013Article
- Intrajejunal migration of adjustable gastric band: a case report.Current health sciences journal · 2013Article
- Unusual gastric band migration outcome: distal small bowel obstruction and coming out per-rectum.The Pan African medical journal · 2012Article
- Endoscopic management of penetrated adjustable gastric band with its connecting tube: report of a case.Obesity facts · 2011Article
- Fourteen-year long-term results after gastric banding.Journal of obesity · 2011Article
- Laparoscopic gastric band migration: role of environmental factors in the experience of a single team in three operating rooms.Obesity surgery · 2010Article
- Simultaneous gastric and colic laparoscopic adjustable gastric band migration. Complication of bariatric surgery.Obesity surgery · 2010Article
- Laparoscopic adjustable gastric band: 4-year experience and learning curve.JSLS : Journal of the Society of Laparoendoscopic SurgeonsArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
17 authors at 10 institutions in 4 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundAdjustable silicone gastric banding (ASGB) is an effective treatment in morbid obesity. Band migration is a long-term complication. Causes, clinical symptoms, timing and incidence are investigated in single centres only. In Germany, since January 1st, 2005, practice in bariatric surgery has been investigated in German prospective multicenter trial for quality assurance in obesity surgery. MATERIALS AND
methodsAll patients underwent ASGB in two centres of bariatric surgery in Germany were prospectively registered using a computer-based data form. Patients with band migration were retrospectively evaluated, in particular, causes and characteristics of its management. The results were correlated with data obtained from the German prospective multicentre trial.
resultsIn total, 493 patients were enrolled in the study from February 1995 to February 2007. The follow-up rate was 79.9% (mean follow-up time period, 78.7 months; range, 2-148 months). Fifteen patients (3.0%) developed migration. In 14 cases, migration occurred within the range of 30-86 months after implantation. In one case, migration occurred 10 months after repositioning of the band. In the German multicentre trial, 629 patients underwent surgery during 2005 and 827 patients in 2006. In both periods, 74.4% of the patients were female and 25.6% male. The most frequently performed operation was ASGB (46.8%) followed by Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (38.5%).
conclusionBand migration requires band removal. Different symptoms and complications influence the kind of band removal. Multicentre data were evident in the case of high long-term complication rate after ASGB. Data of the German multicentre trial show the trend from restrictive bariatric procedures to malabsorptive approach.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.