Who was studied, and how
Three numbers in the abstract
Where each one falls
Where it lands on the map
404people with type 2 diabetes, in this paper
Already taking product of AUC(ins/gluc) and Matsuda index, or nottheir own situation, not assigned
on product of AUC(ins/gluc) and Matsuda index
not on product of AUC(ins/gluc) and Matsuda index
Product of AUC(ins/gluc) and Matsuda index went with lower product of AUC and Matsuda index−212
correlation, not a testthe abstract, start to end
… index progressively decreased from NGT (212) to IGT (193) to diabetes (104) (P < 0.001), consistent with …
← favours treatmentfavours comparator →
could be chanceNo interval given · direction only, strength unknown
Product of AUC(ins/gluc) and Matsuda indexproduct of AUC(ins/gluc) and Matsuda index, in NGT
−212
Product of AUC(ins/gluc) and Matsuda indexproduct of AUC(ins/gluc) and Matsuda index, in IGT
−193
Product of AUC(ins/gluc) and Matsuda indexproduct of AUC(ins/gluc) and Matsuda index, in diabetes
−104
Cardiac procedures & devicesGlycemic control
1 / 4