Evidence map›Paper›PMID 19029938›Full record

ReviewOncogene2008

Polarity proteins in migration and invasion.

S Etienne-Manneville

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Oncogene, 2008. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 158 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
158citing papers in PubMed
9.1field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

158 citing papers in PubMed, 289 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Analysis of Chemotactic Property of CCN2/CTGF in Intramembranous Osteogenesis.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2023
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

98 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.

S Etienne-MannevilleCell polarity and migration group, Institut Pasteur and CNRS URA 2582, Paris cedex 15, France. sandrine.etienne-manneville@pasteur.fr
Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cancer is the result of the deregulation of cell proliferation and cell migration. In advanced tumors, cells invade the surrounding tissue and eventually form metastases. This is particularly evident in carcinomas in which epithelial cells have undergone epithelial-mesenchymal transition. Increased cell migration often correlates with a weakening of intercellular interactions. Junctions between neighboring epithelial cells are required to establish and maintain baso-apical polarity, suggesting that not only loss of cell-cell adhesion but also alteration of cell polarity is involved during invasion. Accordingly, perturbation of cell polarity is an important hallmark of advanced invasive tumors. Cell polarity is also essential for cell migration. Indeed, a front-rear polarity axis has first to be generated to allow a cell to migrate. Because cells migrate during invasion, cell polarity is not completely lost. Instead, polarity is modified. From a nonmigrating baso-apically polarized epithelial phenotype, cells acquire a polarized migrating mesenchymal phenotype. The aim of this review is to highlight the molecular relationship between the control of cell polarity and the regulation of cell motility during oncogenesis.

Indexed as

Cell PolarityAnimalsCell AdhesionCell MovementEpithelial CellsHumansMembrane ProteinsModels, BiologicalNeoplasm InvasivenessOncogenesProtein TransportSignal TransductionMembrane Proteins

Identifiers

PMID19029938
OpenAlexW2030364807

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.