Evidence mapPaperPMID 19046244Full record

Trial reportDiabetic medicine : a journal of the British Diabetic Association2008

Clinical effectiveness of a brief educational intervention in Type 1 diabetes: results from the BITES (Brief Intervention in Type 1 diabetes, Education for Self-efficacy) trial.

J T George, A P Valdovinos, I Russell, P Dromgoole, S Lomax, D J Torgerson, T Wells, J C Thow

Open access · bronzeAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Diabetic medicine : a journal of the British Diabetic Association, 2008. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
1.9field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 64 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Diabetes: glycaemic control in type 1.BMJ clinical evidence · 2011
    Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Older adults' common sense models of diabetes.American journal of health behavior · 2011
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 6 institutions in 3 countries.

J T GeorgeYork Hospital and Hull-York Medical School (HYMS), York, UK.
A P Valdovinos
I Russell
P Dromgoole
S Lomax
D J Torgerson
T Wells
J C Thow
Mexican Social Security Institute · MXAmerican Association of Nurse Practitioners · USBangor University · GBHull York Medical School · GBSunderland Royal Hospital · GBUniversity of York · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aimsIntensive 5-day educational interventions for people with Type 1 diabetes have shown improved outcomes in a number of European studies. The aim was to assess the effectiveness of a brief (2.5 days) psycho-educational intervention.

methodsOur randomized trial in a secondary-care setting had 54 and 60 participants allocated to intervention and control groups, respectively. Primary outcomes were HbA1c and severe hypoglycaemia. Secondary outcomes were blood pressure, weight, height, lipids and psychometric profile.

resultsHbA1c showed no statistically significant change at 3 months [difference = 0.01, 95% confidence interval (CI) -0.23, 0.26, P = 0.92], 6 months (difference = -0.06, 95% CI -0.32, 0.20, P = 0.67) and 12 months (difference = 0.01, 95% CI -0.30, 0.32, P = 0.94). Incidence of severe hypoglycaemia (per patient per year) in the intervention group (0.41) and control group (0.48) was not statistically different. Treatment satisfaction improved at 3 months (difference = 9.4, 95% CI 5.2, 13.6, P = 0.0005), 6 months (difference = 10.4, 95% CI 6.0, 14.8, P = 0.0005) and 12 months (difference = 7.1, 95% CI 2.1, 12.1, P = 0.006). The 'Managing psychological aspects' and 'Setting and achieving goals' dimensions of the Diabetes Empowerment Scale also showed significant improvement at 3, 6 and 12 months. Diabetes Knowledge Test, Illness Perception Questionnaire, Hypoglycaemia Fear Scale and Short Form 36 showed no significant change.

conclusionsThis brief intervention had no significant impact on HbA(1c) or severe hypoglycaemia, but improved diabetes treatment satisfaction and patient empowerment. Current Controlled Trials ISRCTN75807800.

Indexed as

Patient Education as TopicAdultDiabetes Mellitus, Type 1FemaleGlycated HemoglobinHumansHypoglycemiaMaleMiddle AgedRisk Reduction BehaviorTreatment OutcomeGlycated Hemoglobin

Identifiers

PMID19046244
PMCPMC2701554
OpenAlexW2032092504

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.