Evidence mapPaperPMID 19190588Full record

ArticleNature clinical practice. Endocrinology & metabolism2009

Does intensive glycemic control for type 2 diabetes mellitus have long-term benefits for cardiovascular disease risk?

Georgia Soldatos, Mark E Cooper

Abstract readComment
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Nature clinical practice. Endocrinology & metabolism, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
0.2field-weighted citation impact, top 43% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 2 countries.

Georgia SoldatosJDRF Danielle Alberti Memorial Centre for Diabetes Complications, Baker IDI Heart and Diabetes Research Institute, PO Box 6492, St Kilda Road Central, Melbourne, Victoria 3008, Australia. georgia.soldatos@bakeridi.edu.au
Mark E Cooper
Juvenile Diabetes Research Foundation · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This Practice Point commentary discusses the findings of the 10-year follow-up of the United Kingdom Prospective Diabetes Study, which was a multicenter, randomized, controlled trial in which patients with newly diagnosed type 2 diabetes mellitus received conventional or intensive glycemic control. The follow-up study by Holman et al. suggests that intensive glycemic control can have long-lasting benefits in reducing the incidence not only of diabetes-related end points and microvascular complications (as shown in the original UKPDS study) but also of myocardial infarction and death from any cause. These benefits occurred despite the early loss of within-trial differences in HbA(1c) levels between the intensive and conventional treatment groups. The findings of Holman et al. support the notion of a sustained, legacy effect of intensive glycemic control, which was originally suggested in the Epidemiology of Diabetes Interventions and Complications study.

Identifiers

PMID19190588
OpenAlexW1967801754

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.