Evidence map›Paper›PMID 19200729›Full record

ReviewTrends in cell biology2009

Guidance from above: common cues direct distinct signaling outcomes in vascular and neural patterning.

Maria V Gelfand, Shangyu Hong, Chenghua Gu

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Trends in cell biology, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 38 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
38citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

38 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. UsingFrontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2021
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Retinal Vasculature in Development and Diseases.Annual review of vision science · 2018
    Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Semaphorins and their Signaling Mechanisms.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2017
    Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Eph/ephrin signaling in the kidney and lower urinary tract.Pediatric nephrology (Berlin, Germany) · 2016
    Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Maria V GelfandDepartment of Neurobiology, Harvard Medical School, 220 Longwood Avenue, Boston, MA 02115, USA.
Shangyu Hong
Chenghua Gu

Funding

PHD TRAINING IN NEUROSCIENCET32MH020017 · NIMH · HARVARD UNIVERSITY (MEDICAL SCHOOL) · PI JOHN ASSAD · 1997 to 2026
$15.8M
NIMH NIH HHS T32 MH020017
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The nervous and vascular systems are both exquisitely branched and complicated systems and their proper development requires careful guidance of nerves and vessels. The recent realization that common ligand-receptor pairs are used in guiding the patterning of both systems has prompted the question of whether similar signaling pathways are used in both systems. This review highlights recent progress in our understanding of the similarities and differences in the intracellular signaling mechanisms downstream of semaphorins, ephrins and vascular endothelial growth factor in neurons and endothelial cells during neural and vascular development. We present evidence that similar intracellular signaling principles underlying cytoskeletal regulation are used to control neural and vascular guidance, although the specific molecules used in neurons and endothelial cells are often different.

Indexed as

AnimalsBlood VesselsCuesEndothelium, VascularHumansNeuronsSignal Transduction

Identifiers

PMID19200729
PMCPMC3654375

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.