Evidence map›Paper›PMID 19464082›Full record

ArticleAtencion primaria2009

[Metformin also as first choice in patients with normal weight. Has its use increased?].

Eduardo Carracedo-Martínez, Agustin Pia-Morandeira

Abstract readEnglish Abstract
In one paragraph

Article in Atencion primaria, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Eduardo Carracedo-MartínezArea Sanitaria de Santiago de Compostela, Servicio Gallego de Salud, Santiago de Compostela, A Coruña, España. eduardo.carracedo.martinez@sergas.es
Agustin Pia-Morandeira

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo assess whether the release of the new consensus algorithms in August 2006, along with the consensus recommendation of also using metformin as first choice in patients with normal weight, has led to an increase in the use of this drug in the period immediately after.

designRetrospective longitudinal Study. SITES: Santiago de Compostela Health District (A Coruña).

participantsUsers of the Galician health service in the Santiago de Compostela Health District.

methodsThe evolution of the monthly number of DHD (Daily Defined Doses/1000 inhabitants/day) of metformin from early 2003 until 12 months after the issuing of new algorithms was analysed graphically and using a multiple regression model.

resultsThe graphical representation of the DHD of metformin over time shows a linear growth for the period, but there is an increasing trend after the publication of the new consensus algorithm. The multiple regression showed that the increase is statistically significant.

conclusionsFollowing the publication of the new consensus algorithm an increasing trend in the use of metformin is observed in the short term.

Indexed as

Body WeightDiabetes Mellitus, Type 2HumansHypoglycemic AgentsLongitudinal StudiesMetforminReference ValuesRetrospective StudiesHypoglycemic AgentsMetformin

Identifiers

PMID19464082
PMCPMC7022010

What Socratic holds

Texttitle and abstract
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.