SynthesisLancet (London, England)2009
Aspirin in the primary and secondary prevention of vascular disease: collaborative meta-analysis of individual participant data from randomised trials.
Synthesis in Lancet (London, England), 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 6 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 1,161 papers, 17 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Improving Equitable Acces and Adherence to Secondary Prevention Therapy With a Fixed-Dose Combination Drug
A Randomized, Open-label, Active-controlled, Parallel-group Study to Investigate the Platelet Inhibition of Ticagrelor Versus Clopidogrel in Patients With Stable Coronary Artery Disease and Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus After Recent Elective Percutaneous Coronary Intervention
Antiplatlet Effects of Standardized Tomato Extract in Hypertensive Subjects at High Estimated Cardiovascular Risk
Aspirin Withdrawal and Clinical Outcome in Patients With Moderate to High Cardiovascular Risk But Without Cardiovascular Disease
Association of PeriOPerative Aspirin-ResisTance and CardioVascular Outcome
HOST-EXAM-Ex : Harmonizing Optimal Strategy for Treatment of Coronary Artery Stenosis - EXtended Antiplatelet Monotherapy - EXtended Follow up
Who cites it
1,161 citing papers in PubMed, 17 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 3,652 citations in OpenAlex.
- Antiplatelet dilemma: Clopidogrel or aspirin for long-term cardiovascular protection after dual antiplatelet therapy following PCI.Medicine · 2026Pooled it
- Clopidogrel versus aspirin monotherapy following dual antiplatelet therapy after percutaneous coronary intervention: an updated meta-analysis of 162,829 patients.European journal of clinical pharmacology · 2026Pooled it
- 10. Cardiovascular Disease and Risk Management: Standards of Care in Diabetes-2026.Diabetes care · 2026Guideline
- Antiplatelet versus anticoagulation treatment for people with heart failure in sinus rhythm.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2025Pooled it
- P2YBMJ (Clinical research ed.) · 2025Pooled it
- Comparison of P2Y12 inhibitors and aspirin in secondary prevention of coronary events: a meta-analysis of RCTs.BMC cardiovascular disorders · 2025Pooled it
- The effect of sodium-glucose co-transporter 2 inhibitors on clinical outcomes after acute myocardial infarction: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.Future cardiology · 2025Pooled it
- Methods and validity indicators for measuring adherence and persistence to aspirin in secondary cardiovascular prevention: a systematic review.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2025Pooled it
- Anticoagulation in device-detected atrial fibrillation with or without vascular disease: a combined analysis of the NOAH-AFNET 6 and ARTESiA trials.European heart journal · 2024Pooled it
- [Cardiovascular preventive recommendations. PAPPS 2024 thematic updates].Atencion primaria · 2024Guideline
- Racial and ethnic differences in restarting antiplatelet therapy in patients with primary intracranial hemorrhage: a systematic review and meta-analysis.BMC neurology · 2024Pooled it
- 2023 Clinical Practice Guidelines for Diabetes Management in Korea: Full Version Recommendation of the Korean Diabetes Association.Diabetes & metabolism journal · 2024Guideline
- Effect of aspirin on blood pressure in hypertensive patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis.BMC cardiovascular disorders · 2024Pooled it
- Cardiovascular Protection of Aspirin in Chronic Kidney Disease Patients: An Updated Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Current vascular pharmacology · 2024Pooled it
- Endometriosis and aspirin: a systematic review.Frontiers in endocrinology · 2024Pooled it
- Acetylsalicylic acid dosed at bedtime vs. dosed in the morning for circadian rhythm of blood pressure- a systematic review and meta-analysis.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2024Pooled it
- P2YReviews in cardiovascular medicine · 2023Pooled it
- Effect of aspirin on healthspan in community-dwelling older adults: the ASPirin in reducing events in the elderly study.Age and ageing · 2026Trial
- Aspirin, cardiovascular events, and major bleeding in older adults: extended follow-up of the ASPREE trial.European heart journal · 2025Trial
- Eradication ofHealth technology assessment (Winchester, England) · 2025Trial
1,101 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
- Commented on by
- Commented on by
- Commented on by
- Commented on by
- Commented on by
- Commented on by
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
14 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundLow-dose aspirin is of definite and substantial net benefit for many people who already have occlusive vascular disease. We have assessed the benefits and risks in primary prevention.
methodsWe undertook meta-analyses of serious vascular events (myocardial infarction, stroke, or vascular death) and major bleeds in six primary prevention trials (95,000 individuals at low average risk, 660,000 person-years, 3554 serious vascular events) and 16 secondary prevention trials (17,000 individuals at high average risk, 43,000 person-years, 3306 serious vascular events) that compared long-term aspirin versus control. We report intention-to-treat analyses of first events during the scheduled treatment period.
findingsIn the primary prevention trials, aspirin allocation yielded a 12% proportional reduction in serious vascular events (0.51% aspirin vs 0.57% control per year, p=0.0001), due mainly to a reduction of about a fifth in non-fatal myocardial infarction (0.18%vs 0.23% per year, p<0.0001). The net effect on stroke was not significant (0.20%vs 0.21% per year, p=0.4: haemorrhagic stroke 0.04%vs 0.03%, p=0.05; other stroke 0.16%vs 0.18% per year, p=0.08). Vascular mortality did not differ significantly (0.19%vs 0.19% per year, p=0.7). Aspirin allocation increased major gastrointestinal and extracranial bleeds (0.10%vs 0.07% per year, p<0.0001), and the main risk factors for coronary disease were also risk factors for bleeding. In the secondary prevention trials, aspirin allocation yielded a greater absolute reduction in serious vascular events (6.7%vs 8.2% per year, p<0.0001), with a non-significant increase in haemorrhagic stroke but reductions of about a fifth in total stroke (2.08%vs 2.54% per year, p=0.002) and in coronary events (4.3%vs 5.3% per year, p<0.0001). In both primary and secondary prevention trials, the proportional reductions in the aggregate of all serious vascular events seemed similar for men and women.
interpretationIn primary prevention without previous disease, aspirin is of uncertain net value as the reduction in occlusive events needs to be weighed against any increase in major bleeds. Further trials are in progress.
fundingUK Medical Research Council, British Heart Foundation, Cancer Research UK, and the European Community Biomed Programme.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.